The test suite is far from full coverage, but it is a good start. Thanks for this PR, we really needed this fix, and we can move on.

It seems Travis is down, so that is why it did not tell you have lots of Checkstyle errors in the test class and a missing licence header. Please fix this, as well as my other comments. After it, the PR can be merged.

We have a problem:

ItemClicksHandledActivity.java:[116,9] org.androidannotations.annotations.ItemSelect can only have the following parameters: [ [ boolean or java.lang.Boolean ], [ extending java.lang.Object (optional) ],  ] in the order above
ItemClicksHandledActivity.java:[131,9] org.androidannotations.annotations.ItemSelect can only have the following parameters: [ [ boolean or java.lang.Boolean ], [ extending java.lang.Object (optional) ],  ] in the order above
ItemClicksHandledActivity.java:[142,9] org.androidannotations.annotations.ItemSelect can only have the following parameters: [ [ boolean or java.lang.Boolean ], [ extending java.lang.Object (optional) ],  ] in the order above

The problem here that ItemSelect really accepts any type (any reference type or primitive type), except that if the second parameter is primitive int, than it is treated as a position, otherwise as the element.
But anyType() does not accept any types, only any classes. We should rename it to anyClass() or such, then introduce a new anyType() validator which indeed accepts any type (primitive or class).

I addressed your comments.
I hope @dodgex is okay for setting him as author of the last commit since I copied-pasted his gist.

@yDelouis sure i'm okay with that. Thanks :)

@yDelouis i just saw the getWrapperType() method, and it is half-done, not sure why. Can you fix that?

@yDelouis also please rebase this so the build can go green.

@yDelouis any update on this?