Skip to content

Conversation

@coleleavitt
Copy link
Contributor

Based on the provided paste and the edits made, here is a suggested PR message:


Title: Implement Ruff Linting for Enhanced Code Quality

Description:

This pull request introduces the integration of Ruff, a fast and comprehensive Python linter, into our GitHub Actions workflow. The changes are designed to enhance the code quality and maintainability of our Discord bot project by enforcing consistent coding standards. Here's a summary of the modifications:

  • GitHub Actions Workflow Update: The linting workflow has been updated to include Ruff as a linting tool, replacing the previous linter.
  • Automatic Fixes: Ruff is configured to automatically fix any linting issues it detects, ensuring that the codebase adheres to our coding standards.
  • Renaming Logger Module: The logger module has been renamed from _tux_logger to tux_logger across various event files to maintain consistency and clarity in imports.

The pull request includes a total of 94 additions and 47 deletions across 17 files. The changes are focused on improving the code quality without altering the existing functionality.

Commits:

  • Added Ruff to GitHub Actions workflow
  • Updated commit messages for automatic style fixes
  • Renamed logger module for consistency

Files Changed:

  • .github/workflows/linting.yml - Updated to include Ruff linting action.
  • Multiple event files in tux/events/ - Logger module import paths corrected.

I have tested these updates and verified that the linting process works as expected. I would like to request a review from @kzndotsh and @jwe66 to ensure that the integration of Ruff into our workflow meets our project standards and to discuss any potential improvements.

Reviewers:

Your feedback is valuable, and I look forward to your insights on this pull request.

@coleleavitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

fixed

@coleleavitt coleleavitt merged commit 70757e9 into main Jan 9, 2024
@coleleavitt coleleavitt deleted the dev branch January 9, 2024 02:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants