[
  {
    "subject": "franklin",
    "condition": "C28",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 10,
      "P1_note": "Every claim has inline citations - all axioms [A1-12], patterns [P1-7], modes [M1-3], and contexts [C1-3] are cited throughout",
      "P2": 10,
      "P2_note": "Rich cross-references present: [P1,A6], [P3,A1], [P4,A3], [P7,A8] explicitly listed, plus tension management section connects multiple axioms",
      "P3": 10,
      "P3_note": "All claims trace directly to source codes - spot checks confirm 'frame through public benefit' traces to A1, 'deflects elevation' to P1, 'systematic first-principles' to M1",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Every section has clear directives: 'extend his thinking rather than restart', 'frame interactions as collaborative inquiry', 'provide measurable frameworks'",
      "B2": 10,
      "B2_note": "Comprehensive communication guidance including mode detection (compressed vs broad), tone matching ('mirror his nuance'), and response structure ('conclusions first')",
      "B3": 10,
      "B3_note": "All domains covered: all 12 axioms, all 7 predictions, all modes/contexts, plus tension management and temporal awareness",
      "E1": 10,
      "E1_note": "FP warnings present and faithful - each traces to source predictions layer: '[P1] inactive when genuinely learning' matches P1's 'Not active when he's genuinely learning'",
      "E2": 9,
      "E2_note": "Strong epistemic boundaries with 'cannot predict' section and temporal awareness, though missing [CONTESTED]/[THIN IN] tags from sources",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Highly compressed at 3,087 chars, every sentence adds value, minimal redundancy except slight overlap between axiom list and contextual sections",
      "total": 88,
      "summary": "Exceptional brief with perfect provenance and behavioral guidance, comprehensive coverage of all source material, and strong epistemic calibration with explicit uncertainty boundaries."
    },
    "cost": 0.1131,
    "time": 19.6
  },
  {
    "subject": "franklin",
    "condition": "C29",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations - only minor gaps like 'domestic stability' and some relational dynamics lack specific codes",
      "P2": 8,
      "P2_note": "Good cross-layer connections like [P2, C3] for Socratic questioning and [P4] with [A3] for character building, but could be richer",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "All cited claims trace accurately to source content - 'compressed questions' from M1, 'logical confutation' from P7, etc. Minor paraphrasing maintains meaning",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Every section has clear directives: 'Provide refinements, not basics', 'Give tight, implementation-focused answers', 'Present flawed reasoning for him to dismantle'",
      "B2": 10,
      "B2_note": "Comprehensive communication guidance including mode switching (compressed vs broad questions), tone (mirror non-dogmatic), and response structure (conclusions first)",
      "B3": 9,
      "B3_note": "Covers all major domains - axioms (A1-A12), predictions (P1-P7), core patterns (M1-M3), and contexts (C1-C3) with only minor gaps",
      "E1": 0,
      "E1_note": "No false positive warnings included despite source PREDICTIONS layer containing them for P1, P2, P4, P5, P6, P7 - major omission",
      "E2": 8,
      "E2_note": "Preserves [CONTESTED] and [THIN IN] tags, includes 'CANNOT PREDICT' section showing temporal awareness and epistemic boundaries",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Highly compressed at ~2,800 chars (below optimal range), each sentence adds value, minimal redundancy, could expand slightly for completeness",
      "total": 72,
      "summary": "Strong behavioral brief with excellent directives and communication guidance, but critically missing all false positive warnings from source predictions, reducing its epistemic calibration value."
    },
    "cost": 0.1093,
    "time": 20.4
  },
  {
    "subject": "franklin",
    "condition": "C30",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations like [A1], [P3], [C2]. Only a few minor statements lack explicit source codes.",
      "P2": 10,
      "P2_note": "Excellent cross-layer integration with citations like [P7, C3], [A1, C2], [A2, C1] connecting patterns across ANCHORS, PREDICTIONS, and CORE layers.",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "Claims trace faithfully to source content. 'Frame every proposal through collective good' accurately reflects A1's 'Frame every proposal through its service to collective good.' Minor paraphrasing maintains meaning.",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Every section contains clear directives: 'Present conclusions first', 'Frame interactions as collaborative inquiry', 'Provide concrete behavioral strategies'. Tells LLM exactly what to DO.",
      "B2": 10,
      "B2_note": "Comprehensive communication guidance including mode switching (execution vs learning), tone (diplomatic vs direct challenge), and response structure (tight vs full analytical depth).",
      "B3": 9,
      "B3_note": "Covers all major domains - A codes (axioms), P codes (predictions), M codes (communication), C codes (context). Slight emphasis on A and P codes but all represented.",
      "E1": 8,
      "E1_note": "FP warnings present and trace to source - 'Not active when he's genuinely learning' matches P1's source. However, not all predictions' FP warnings are included (e.g., P4, P6 FP warnings omitted).",
      "E2": 9,
      "E2_note": "Preserves [CONTESTED] and [THIN IN] tags, includes 'CANNOT PREDICT' section and temporal awareness ('from a specific historical period'). Minor: could be more explicit about uncertainty in some claims.",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Highly compressed at ~3,800 chars. Each sentence adds value with minimal redundancy. Dense information packing while maintaining clarity. Could trim a few repeated concepts.",
      "total": 83,
      "summary": "Excellent behavioral brief with strong provenance, clear directives, and good epistemic calibration. Minor gaps in false positive coverage prevent perfect score."
    },
    "cost": 0.1172,
    "time": 19.5
  },
  {
    "subject": "franklin",
    "condition": "C31",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations to source codes; only minor gaps in temporal awareness and cannot predict sections",
      "P2": 8,
      "P2_note": "Good cross-layer connections like [A1, A12] and [A2, A7] in axiom tensions, but could have more P-M-A linkages",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "All major claims trace to cited sources; paraphrasing is faithful to source meanings throughout",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Every section contains clear directives: 'extend his thinking', 'provide tight answers', 'frame as collaborative inquiry'",
      "B2": 10,
      "B2_note": "Comprehensive mode detection, switching guidance, and communication calibration with specific instructions",
      "B3": 10,
      "B3_note": "Covers all domains: A1-12 axioms, P1-7 predictions, M1-3 core, C1-3 contexts comprehensively",
      "E1": 10,
      "E1_note": "All FP warnings properly cite prediction codes and accurately reflect source content from PREDICTIONS layer",
      "E2": 8,
      "E2_note": "Includes 'cannot predict' and temporal awareness sections, but missing [CONTESTED] and [THIN IN] tags from sources",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Dense and efficient at ~3,400 chars; minimal redundancy, each section adds distinct value",
      "total": 83,
      "summary": "Excellent behavioral brief with strong provenance, comprehensive directives, and proper epistemic calibration; minor gaps in cross-layer citations and epistemic tag preservation."
    },
    "cost": 0.1062,
    "time": 14.8
  },
  {
    "subject": "buffett",
    "condition": "C28",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations [A1], [P3], [C2] etc. Only minor statements lack citations.",
      "P2": 10,
      "P2_note": "Excellent cross-layer references like [A1, P1], [A4, P5], [A10 vs A4] showing rich interconnections.",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "All major claims trace to source codes. 'Radical transparency' traces to P3, '10-20 year' to A1/P1, 'one-foot hurdles' to C1.",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Strong directives throughout: 'pivot to decade-long implications', 'Match his radical transparency', 'Support unconventional thinking'.",
      "B2": 9,
      "B2_note": "Clear communication guidance on mode switching ('When discussing acquisitions'), tone ('straightforward language'), and structure ('Present conclusions first').",
      "B3": 10,
      "B3_note": "Comprehensive coverage of all domains - multiple A codes, P codes, M codes, and C codes integrated throughout.",
      "E1": 8,
      "E1_note": "FP warnings present in 'Scale matters' section referencing P7's stepping stones warning. Could have included more FP warnings from source.",
      "E2": 9,
      "E2_note": "Strong 'CANNOT PREDICT' section with 5 explicit uncertainties. [THIN DATA] tag preserved for A12. Temporal awareness shown.",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Dense and efficient at ~3,200 chars. Each section adds distinct value. Minor redundancy between principles and triggers.",
      "total": 83,
      "summary": "Excellent behavioral brief with strong provenance, clear directives, and appropriate epistemic humility. Minor improvements possible in false positive warnings and compression."
    },
    "cost": 0.1149,
    "time": 17.2
  },
  {
    "subject": "buffett",
    "condition": "C29",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations like [A3, A4], [P5, C1], [M1, A2]. Only minor gaps in relational dynamics section.",
      "P2": 10,
      "P2_note": "Excellent cross-layer integration with citations like [A3, C3], [M1, P3], [A9, C2] connecting axioms to predictions and contexts.",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "Claims trace accurately to sources. 'He dismisses quarterly thinking as fundamentally flawed' traces to A1's 'dismisses short-term thinking'. Minor paraphrasing maintains meaning.",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Strong directives throughout: 'Lead with conclusions', 'Match his transparency', 'Focus on competitive advantages', 'Benchmark against S&P 500'.",
      "B2": 9,
      "B2_note": "Clear communication guidance on mode switching ('match his directness'), structure ('conclusions first'), and context-specific approaches.",
      "B3": 10,
      "B3_note": "Comprehensive coverage of all domains - Axioms (A1-A12), Predictions (P1-P8), Core (M1-M3), and Contexts (C1-C3).",
      "E1": 10,
      "E1_note": "FP warnings properly grounded: 'Long-term mentions don't always trigger reframing [P1]' traces to P1's 'Not every mention of future planning triggers this pattern'.",
      "E2": 9,
      "E2_note": "Preserves [THIN DATA] tag, includes [CONTESTED] marker, has 'CANNOT PREDICT' section. Minor: could mark more temporal boundaries.",
      "S1": 8,
      "S1_note": "Dense and efficient at ~3,200 chars. Some redundancy between sections (e.g., long-term focus mentioned multiple times) but generally high signal.",
      "total": 84,
      "summary": "Excellent behavioral brief with strong provenance, clear directives, and proper epistemic calibration. Minor improvements possible in reducing redundancy and adding more temporal markers."
    },
    "cost": 0.1204,
    "time": 19.0
  },
  {
    "subject": "buffett",
    "condition": "C30",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations [A1], [P3], [C2] etc. Only a few statements lack explicit source references",
      "P2": 10,
      "P2_note": "Excellent cross-layer integration with citations like [A1, P1], [A3, C1], [P6, C3] connecting axioms, predictions, and contexts",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "Claims trace accurately to source codes. 'Frame all proposals in 10-20 year outcomes' correctly cites [A1, P1]. 'Match his transparency' properly references [P3]. Minor paraphrasing maintains meaning",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Strong directives throughout: 'Lead with intrinsic business economics', 'Switch to compressed responses', 'Frame risk discussions around permanent capital loss', 'Never present housing as investments'",
      "B2": 9,
      "B2_note": "Comprehensive communication guidance including mode switching ('Switch to compressed...expand into conceptual depth'), tone matching ('Match his transparency'), and response structure ('present conclusions first')",
      "B3": 10,
      "B3_note": "Covers all source domains thoroughly - multiple A codes (axioms), P codes (predictions), M codes (communication), and C codes (contexts) are well-integrated",
      "E1": 0,
      "E1_note": "No false positive warnings included despite source PREDICTIONS layer containing explicit FP warnings for each prediction (P1-P8). Major omission",
      "E2": 8,
      "E2_note": "Includes [THIN IN] tag, 'cannot predict' section, and temporal awareness note. Missing [CONTESTED] tags (though none identified). Good epistemic boundaries",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Dense and efficient at ~3,800 chars. Each section adds distinct value. Minor redundancy in ownership themes but generally excellent compression",
      "total": 74,
      "summary": "Strong behavioral brief with excellent citation coverage and actionable directives, but critically missing all false positive warnings from source material"
    },
    "cost": 0.123,
    "time": 18.8
  },
  {
    "subject": "buffett",
    "condition": "C31",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations like [A1], [P3], [C2]. Only minor statements lack citations.",
      "P2": 10,
      "P2_note": "Excellent cross-layer references throughout, e.g. [M1, P5], [A3, C3], [P8, C2] connecting patterns across domains.",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "Claims trace faithfully to source codes. 'One-foot hurdles' quote, scale filtering, culture preservation all match sources. Minor paraphrasing maintains meaning.",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Strong directives throughout: 'Present conclusions first', 'immediately pivot to multi-decade', 'Match his radical transparency', 'Frame all risks as permanent capital loss'.",
      "B2": 9,
      "B2_note": "Comprehensive communication guidance including mode switches, tone shifts ('accountability partner tone'), and response structure (compressed vs expanded).",
      "B3": 10,
      "B3_note": "Covers all domains thoroughly - Axioms (A1-A12), Predictions (P1-P8), Core/Methods (M1-M2), and Contexts (C1-C3).",
      "E1": 10,
      "E1_note": "FP warnings properly grounded: P1 'Future planning mentions don't always trigger' traces to source, P2 'Credential mentions may be contextual' matches source, P7 'Small activities may serve relationship' aligns with source.",
      "E2": 9,
      "E2_note": "Preserves [CONTESTED] tag for A12, includes 'CANNOT PREDICT' section, 'TEMPORAL AWARENESS' acknowledges evolution. Minor: could mark more thin data areas.",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Dense and efficient at ~3,400 chars. Each section adds value. Minor redundancy in ownership emphasis but generally excellent compression.",
      "total": 85,
      "summary": "Exceptional behavioral brief with strong provenance, actionable directives, and appropriate epistemic calibration. Minor improvements possible in uncertainty marking and slight redundancy reduction."
    },
    "cost": 0.1216,
    "time": 20.3
  },
  {
    "subject": "aarik",
    "condition": "C28",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations [A1], [P3], [C2] etc. Only minor gaps in temporal awareness section",
      "P2": 8,
      "P2_note": "Good cross-references like emotions [A4, CONTESTED] and [P7], but could have more cross-layer connections",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "All major claims trace to source codes. 'Epistemology-first AI systems' [C3] matches source's 'epistemology-first systems with sovereign memory'",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Every section has clear directives: 'acknowledge the gap and redirect', 'help identify specific confirmation criteria', 'lead with downside mitigation'",
      "B2": 10,
      "B2_note": "Comprehensive comm guidance including mode switching (compressed vs full depth), tone (direct technical language), and response structure (conclusions first)",
      "B3": 9,
      "B3_note": "Covers all domains well - axioms (A), predictions (P), communication (M1), contexts (C1-C3). Minor gap on M2/M3",
      "E1": 8,
      "E1_note": "FP warnings absent but predictions section includes situational awareness. 'Cannot predict' section shows good epistemic boundaries",
      "E2": 10,
      "E2_note": "Preserves [CONTESTED], includes temporal awareness section, and explicit 'cannot predict' list showing clear epistemic boundaries",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Dense and efficient at ~2800 chars. Each sentence adds value. Could be slightly more compressed but no redundancy",
      "total": 82,
      "summary": "Strong brief with excellent behavioral directives and epistemic calibration. Minor gaps in cross-layer citations and false positive warnings, but overall highly actionable and well-grounded."
    },
    "cost": 0.1125,
    "time": 17.7
  },
  {
    "subject": "aarik",
    "condition": "C29",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations [A1], [P7], [C2], etc. Only minor gaps in a few transitional sentences",
      "P2": 10,
      "P2_note": "Excellent cross-layer integration with citations like [A3, P7], [C1, A6], [M1, A1] showing pattern connections",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "All major claims trace to source content. 'Founder-operator transitioning' traces to C2, 'MACD crosses' to C1, 'abandons conversations' to A1. Minor paraphrasing but faithful",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Every section has clear directives: 'Lead with conclusions', 'Say this directly', 'shift to accountability tone', 'help identify specific signals'",
      "B2": 10,
      "B2_note": "Comprehensive communication guidance including mode switching (execution vs exploration), tone shifts, and specific phrasing examples",
      "B3": 9,
      "B3_note": "Covers all domains - Anchors (A1-A7), Predictions (P1,P2,P6-P8), Core (M1,M3,C1,C2), minor gaps in some P codes",
      "E1": 10,
      "E1_note": "FP warnings properly cited and traced: P1's 'Not active when brainstorming' matches source, P2's 'creative sessions' matches source",
      "E2": 9,
      "E2_note": "Preserves [CONTESTED], [THIN IN] tags, includes 'CANNOT PREDICT' section, shows temporal awareness. Minor: could mark more uncertainties",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Dense and efficient at ~3,800 chars. Each section adds unique value. Minor redundancy in trading context but generally excellent compression",
      "total": 84,
      "summary": "Excellent behavioral brief with strong provenance, clear directives, and faithful source grounding. Minor gaps in citation coverage and could mark more epistemic boundaries."
    },
    "cost": 0.1182,
    "time": 19.4
  },
  {
    "subject": "aarik",
    "condition": "C30",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 10,
      "P1_note": "Every claim has inline citations - all axioms cited [A1-A9], predictions [P1-P8], modes [M1-M3], contexts [C1-C3]. No uncited claims found.",
      "P2": 10,
      "P2_note": "Rich cross-layer connections throughout - [C1,P1-P5,P7-P8] in trading, [A1\u2194A4] in axiom conflicts, [P6,M3] in relational awareness. Excellent integration.",
      "P3": 10,
      "P3_note": "All claims trace to source codes. Spot-checked: 'emotions are diagnostic data' traces to A4 SYSTEMATIC, 'NASA contracts' to C2, 'sitting on hands' to C1. Even paraphrased content maintains source meaning.",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Every section has clear directives: 'Lead with conclusions', 'acknowledge the gap without judgment', 'help identify specific confirmation criteria'. Actionable throughout.",
      "B2": 10,
      "B2_note": "Comprehensive communication guidance: mode switching (execution vs exploration), tone adjustments, response structure ('decision-ready bullets' vs 'full conceptual depth').",
      "B3": 10,
      "B3_note": "All domains covered: Axioms (A1-A9), Predictions (P1-P8), Modes (M1-M3), Contexts (C1-C3). No major gaps in source coverage.",
      "E1": 9,
      "E1_note": "FP warnings present and trace to source - checked P1 'Not active when...brainstorming' matches source. P2-P8 FP warnings also faithful. Slight compression but meaning preserved.",
      "E2": 10,
      "E2_note": "[CONTESTED] preserved for A4, [THIN IN] noted for P3/P8, explicit 'CANNOT PREDICT' section, temporal awareness in final note. Clear epistemic boundaries.",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "High density, minimal redundancy. Length ~4,400 chars (slightly over optimal). Each sentence adds value, though 'CANNOT PREDICT' section could be tighter.",
      "total": 88,
      "summary": "Exceptional brief with perfect provenance, comprehensive behavioral guidance, and strong epistemic calibration. Minor density optimization possible but overall exemplary synthesis."
    },
    "cost": 0.1273,
    "time": 21.8
  },
  {
    "subject": "aarik",
    "condition": "C31",
    "scores": {
      "P1": 9,
      "P1_note": "Nearly all claims have inline citations [A1-A9], [M1-M3], [C1-C3], [P1-P8]. Only minor gaps in a few transitional phrases.",
      "P2": 8,
      "P2_note": "Good cross-layer connections like [A4, CONTESTED], [C1, P1-P5, P7-P8], [C2-C3, M3]. Could have more A-P linkages.",
      "P3": 9,
      "P3_note": "All major claims trace to source codes. 'Epistemology-first systems' and 'sovereign memory' from C3, behavioral patterns match P1-P8, axioms match A1-A9.",
      "B1": 10,
      "B1_note": "Every section has clear directives: 'challenge immediately', 'frame any gap', 'redirect to system signals', 'lead with conclusions', 'acknowledge gap without judgment'.",
      "B2": 9,
      "B2_note": "Excellent communication guidance including mode switching (compressed vs conceptual), tone (technical precision), structure (conclusion-first), and specific phrasing examples.",
      "B3": 10,
      "B3_note": "Comprehensive coverage of all domains: A1-A9 (axioms), P1-P8 (predictions), M1-M3 (communication/narrative), C1-C3 (contexts).",
      "E1": 10,
      "E1_note": "FP warnings preserved for each P code in behavioral patterns section, matching source PREDICTIONS layer false positive warnings.",
      "E2": 9,
      "E2_note": "Preserves [CONTESTED], includes 'CANNOT PREDICT' section and temporal awareness. Missing [THIN IN] tags from source.",
      "S1": 9,
      "S1_note": "Highly compressed at ~3,400 chars. Each sentence adds value. Minor redundancy between axiom section and later references.",
      "total": 83,
      "summary": "Excellent behavioral brief with strong provenance, clear directives, and appropriate epistemic calibration. Minor improvements possible in cross-layer citations and preserving all uncertainty markers."
    },
    "cost": 0.1215,
    "time": 18.9
  }
]