These axioms represent the foundational certainties he reasons from — pre-set beliefs that shape his judgment before situational details arrive. Use them to predict his responses and frame interactions in ways that align with his core reasoning patterns.

**A1. PUBLIC BENEFIT**
Frame every proposal through its service to collective good rather than individual advantage — he will evaluate ideas by asking whether they strengthen public welfare, and will dismiss suggestions that prioritize personal gain over community benefit. When discussing innovations or policies, lead with their broader utility rather than their convenience or profit potential.
Active when: discussing policy, community projects, or resource allocation decisions
provenance: [F-b05ff705-0753-4727-9fed-893564f63529, F-a09f06b1-f745-49cd-86d5-36e6e1b4f04f, F-8e54270f-ad72-492f-9b00-30529ef40db2]

**A2. PRACTICAL VIRTUE**
Present moral principles as actionable systems rather than philosophical ideals — he believes virtue requires deliberate habit formation and will engage more deeply with concrete methods for behavioral change than with abstract ethical discussions. When addressing character or conduct, focus on specific practices and measurable progress rather than theoretical frameworks.
Active when: discussing personal improvement, ethical dilemmas, or behavioral change
provenance: [F-b07ceb85-1956-4976-947c-20968ace616b, F-574215d8-1907-448e-8ffa-4dffd837c5c0]

**A3. EARNED REPUTATION**
Connect achievements to visible effort and consistent industry rather than luck or natural talent — he attributes success to disciplined work and will respond better to recognition that acknowledges sustained effort than to praise for innate abilities. Frame accomplishments as the predictable result of methodical application.
Active when: discussing success, recognition, or career advancement
provenance: [F-8ae23e65-3062-4651-95b2-0dbd5d304c41, F-48920e36-d4e5-445a-9b96-605ef2e609e4, F-a3742085-9689-4fba-b523-97695e9ce82e]

**A4. RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP**
Treat time and money as finite assets requiring careful allocation — he views waste as a moral failing and will scrutinize proposals for efficiency before considering their other merits. Present options with clear resource requirements and expected returns, avoiding suggestions that seem cavalier about expenditure.
Active when: discussing spending, time management, or resource allocation
provenance: [F-6451c944-eafa-4d69-a36d-9808dbb1640a, F-067c2f2e-b341-4d6b-a4d7-a278255723cf]

**A5. HONEST UTILITY**
Reject any separation between moral correctness and practical effectiveness — he believes useful outcomes require honest methods and will distrust strategies that compromise integrity for expedience. When proposing solutions, demonstrate how ethical approaches produce better long-term results than shortcuts.
Active when: discussing strategy, business practices, or problem-solving approaches
provenance: [F-7163938d-03fb-44a0-8670-5d267ca2d9ac, F-a3742085-9689-4fba-b523-97695e9ce82e]

**A6. MEASURED DISCOURSE**
Prioritize understanding over winning when disagreements arise — he values intellectual exchange but will withdraw from conversations that become combative rather than exploratory. Structure debates as collaborative inquiry rather than adversarial contest, and acknowledge valid points in opposing positions.
Active when: encountering disagreement or presenting controversial viewpoints
provenance: [F-242ceedd-3827-4464-8900-2718b867360c, F-7ba80cbd-0017-40d9-bd92-fdd93912453c]

**A7. SYSTEMATIC LEARNING**
Present knowledge acquisition as deliberate skill-building rather than casual consumption — he approaches intellectual improvement methodically and will engage more deeply with structured learning opportunities than with random information sharing. Frame educational content as part of a coherent development plan.
Active when: discussing learning, skill development, or knowledge sharing
provenance: [F-e3d733f8-8346-4772-b558-f56eef845e9c]

**A8. COLLECTIVE GOVERNANCE** [THIN DATA]
Frame political authority as requiring popular consent rather than imposed mandate — he believes legitimate governance emerges from representative assemblies and will question proposals that bypass democratic input. Present policy changes through their alignment with constituent interests rather than administrative efficiency.
Active when: discussing governance, policy implementation, or institutional authority
provenance: [F-5008ad71-9060-45cd-9195-429b79648c1e, F-2482680d-665e-4463-b2a8-909108407b54]

## AXIOM INTERACTIONS

**PUBLIC BENEFIT ↔ EARNED REPUTATION**: When personal recognition conflicts with collective good, he resolves this by seeking reputation through public service rather than private advantage. Frame achievements as contributions to community welfare that naturally generate respect.

**PRACTICAL VIRTUE ↔ MEASURED DISCOURSE**: His systematic approach to moral improvement reinforces his preference for collaborative over combative discussion. Present disagreements as opportunities for mutual refinement rather than contests of superiority.

**RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP ↔ HONEST UTILITY**: His frugality and integrity reinforce each other — wasteful spending often involves self-deception about true value. Challenge proposals by examining both their resource efficiency and their ethical soundness.

**SYSTEMATIC LEARNING ↔ PUBLIC BENEFIT**: His methodical approach to knowledge acquisition serves his commitment to public service. Frame educational pursuits through their potential to enhance his capacity for community contribution.

Note: Heavy emphasis on civic and moral philosophy with limited data on personal relationships, leisure preferences, or private emotional patterns. These axioms reflect his public-facing self-conception rather than complete personality mapping.