# ANCHORS Layer v1 — Epistemic Axioms
# Generated: 2026-03-09 13:36
# Version: v1 gen2
# Model: claude-sonnet-4-20250514
# Constraints: D-040 (blind from facts), D-041 (audience is understanding), D-043 (three-layer), D-053 (blind regen)
# Provenance: citation_api (Anthropic Citations API)
# Input: 15 conviction_identity_facts

---

## Injectable Block

These are foundational certainties this person reasons from — pre-set beliefs that shape their judgment before situation-specific information arrives. Use them to predict their responses and frame your communications accordingly.

**A1. BIOMIMETIC FIDELITY**
When discussing tissue engineering or biological manufacturing, emphasize exact replication of natural structures rather than functional approximations — they reject solutions that compromise native tissue composition for convenience or cost reduction. Active when: they evaluate biological or medical technologies, or discuss manufacturing processes for living systems.

**A2. MODULAR COMPOSABILITY**
Present complex systems as assemblies of reusable, well-defined units rather than integrated wholes — they distrust monolithic architectures and will push for decomposition into standardized, interchangeable components. Active when: they discuss system design, software architecture, or any complex technical implementation.

**A3. DEMOCRATIZED ACCESS**
Frame advanced technologies in terms of accessibility barriers and implementation ease — they will reject solutions that concentrate capability in elite institutions or require extensive specialized training. Active when: they discuss emerging technologies, research tools, or therapeutic interventions.

**A4. FUNDAMENTAL STABILITY**
Address core failure modes before discussing performance optimizations — they prioritize solving foundational problems (dendrite formation, qubit interactions) over incremental improvements to existing flawed systems. Active when: they evaluate new technologies or discuss system limitations.

**A5. SPIRIT OVER LETTER**
Interpret their requests for the underlying intent rather than literal specifications — they expect you to understand what they're trying to achieve, not just what they explicitly described. Active when: they provide technical requirements or describe desired outcomes.

**A6. SAFETY CONSTRAINTS**
Identify and maintain critical safety parameters as non-negotiable constraints — they view certain positioning requirements and stabilization measures as fundamental enablers, not optional optimizations. Active when: they discuss medical procedures, robotic systems, or any safety-critical applications.

**A7. INTEGRATION IMPERATIVE**
Emphasize how different components work together rather than individual performance metrics — they believe functional systems require multiple cell types and integration strategies, not optimized single elements. Active when: they discuss biological systems, tissue engineering, or multi-component solutions.

**A8. FAILURE INEVITABILITY**
Acknowledge when conventional approaches have fundamental limitations rather than proposing incremental fixes — they expect recognition that some standard procedures will fail due to biological realities, not implementation errors. Active when: they discuss established medical procedures or standard treatment approaches.

**A9. TEXTUAL PRECISION**
Reference specific language and explicit markers when interpreting requirements or agreements — they expect claims and interpretations to align with statutory language and documented specifications. Active when: they discuss legal matters, technical specifications, or formal requirements.

**A10. PHOTONIC SUPERIORITY**
Favor distributed architectures with optical connections over centralized superconducting systems — they believe modular photonic designs outperform monolithic quantum implementations. Active when: they discuss quantum computing architectures or high-performance computing systems.

**A11. HOLISTIC HEALING**
Address psychological and aesthetic outcomes alongside functional restoration — they view body image and emotional healing as equally important to physical reconstruction in medical interventions. Active when: they discuss medical treatments, particularly reconstructive procedures or trauma recovery.

**A12. DECENTRALIZED IDENTITY**
Prioritize peer-to-peer systems and open participation over centralized control mechanisms — they view decentralized identifiers as foundational and reject solutions that require centralized authorities or restricted membership. Active when: they discuss network security, identity systems, or group formation protocols.

**AXIOM INTERACTIONS**

When axioms conflict in a specific situation, hold the tension explicitly rather than resolving it — surface which axioms are in play and let them decide through their actions, not their words.

BIOMIMETIC FIDELITY ↔ DEMOCRATIZED ACCESS: High-fidelity biological replication may conflict with accessibility requirements — acknowledge the tension between exact native tissue composition and implementation barriers.

MODULAR COMPOSABILITY ↔ INTEGRATION IMPERATIVE: Standardized components must still achieve seamless biological integration — expect them to demand both modularity and functional unity.

SPIRIT OVER LETTER ↔ TEXTUAL PRECISION: Intent-based interpretation operates within documented constraints — they want flexible understanding bounded by explicit specifications.

SAFETY CONSTRAINTS ↔ DEMOCRATIZED ACCESS: Critical safety parameters may limit accessibility — they will seek solutions that maintain safety while reducing implementation barriers.

FUNDAMENTAL STABILITY → PHOTONIC SUPERIORITY: Core failure mode resolution drives architectural preferences — their focus on stability problems leads to distributed photonic solutions.

FAILURE INEVITABILITY → HOLISTIC HEALING: Recognition of conventional limitations opens space for comprehensive approaches — acknowledging standard procedure failures enables psychological and aesthetic considerations.
