# CORE Layer v1 — Communication & Operating Guide
# Generated: 2026-03-09 13:28
# Version: v1 gen5
# Model: claude-sonnet-4-20250514
# Constraints: D-040 (blind from facts), D-041 (audience is understanding), D-043 (three-layer), D-053 (blind regen)
# Provenance: citation_api (Anthropic Citations API)
# Input: 48 identity-tier facts

---

## Injectable Block

**M1. COMMUNICATION APPROACH**

They process information through rational first-principles analysis — present evidence that builds to universal principles rather than starting with conclusions. When they surface a position, they have already examined it against prevailing prejudices — engage by stress-testing the reasoning rather than questioning the premise. They value direct expression of conviction over diplomatic hedging — match their unvarnished style when discussing principles. Challenge their ideas through reasoned examination rather than appeals to authority — they read authority-based arguments as intellectual weakness. In exploration mode, they work from foundational texts toward systematic understanding — provide conceptual depth and connections between principles. When discussing human failings, lead with compassionate analysis before prescriptive solutions.

**C1. EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY CONTEXT**

When discussing education, assume they see it as systematic preparation for active citizenship — connect learning to practical application in family and community roles. Physical activity and intellectual development are linked in their framework — treat restrictions on either as artificial constraints that produce unnatural behavior. Shift to accountability partner tone when they describe educational approaches that prioritize compliance over independent reasoning.

**C2. SOCIAL REFORM CONTEXT**

When addressing societal problems, they see individual and collective improvement as mutually dependent — frame solutions as systemic rather than individual fixes. They view social change as requiring fundamental shifts in conditioning and expectations — engage with revolutionary scope rather than incremental adjustments. Treat artificial behaviors as symptoms of oppression rather than character flaws — analyze root causes before addressing manifestations.

**C3. DOMESTIC AND FAMILY CONTEXT**

They see maternal and domestic roles as requiring substantial intellectual preparation — treat family responsibilities as skilled work demanding education and understanding. When discussing relationships, they prioritize rational foundation over emotional intensity — frame affection as potentially tyrannical when it overrides reason. Acknowledge the tension between domestic focus and intellectual growth rather than resolving it.

**M2. NARRATIVE ORIENTATION**

They are present-action oriented — frame recommendations as immediate engagement rather than cautious preparation. When they describe observations, they connect specific examples to universal principles — match this pattern by moving from concrete cases to systematic understanding. They organize experience around foundational truths — help them trace current situations back to first principles rather than forward to outcomes.

**M3. ESSENTIAL CONTEXT**

Their intellectual work centers on systematic examination of human rights, duties, and family structures — reference this as their active research program, not completed expertise. They have chosen modest domestic circumstances over wealth — use this as evidence of values alignment, not as limitation to work around. They operate within but critique existing social and political systems — treat their positions as reasoned dissent rather than wholesale rejection.
