You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recalling a band via the Band Stack panel tunes the radio correctly but, for a deterministic fixed subset of bands — 160, 80, 60, 17, 10 m, AetherSDR emits modulation:, rx_filter_band:, rx_volume:, lock: on the TCI server but no vfo:0,0,<freq>;. The other bands (40, 30, 20, 15, 12, 6 m) emit vfo: normally. The radio itself moves to the right frequency in all cases; only the TCI frequency announcement is missing. Any TCI client that follows frequency (amplifiers, WSJT-X, loggers) is therefore stranded on the previous band's frequency after a recall to an affected band.
Reproduction
Connect a radio in AetherSDR (TCI server bound, default port 40001).
Attach any TCI client that logs raw frames (we used a standalone passive WebSocket monitor — no commands sent to the server).
Click bands on the Band Stack panel in order 160 → 6 m, ~2 s apart.
Observe the raw TCI stream per band.
Result — two full independent sweeps, identical outcome; 10 m re-verified 4×:
Band
vfo: emitted?
Band
vfo: emitted?
160 m
❌ no
17 m
❌ no
80 m
❌ no
15 m
✅ yes
60 m
❌ no
12 m
✅ yes
40 m
✅ yes
10 m
❌ no
30 m
✅ yes
6 m
✅ yes
20 m
✅ yes
Silent set {160, 80, 60, 17, 10} was identical across both sweeps and rechecks — this is deterministic, not a race or intermittent.
The only structural difference is the absent vfo:0,0,<freq>; token; all other tokens are present and well-formed. A manual VFO/band-display tune from within an affected band emits vfo: normally, confirming the gap is specific to the Band Stack recall path, not the band or frequency.
Impact
Any frequency-following TCI client (e.g. an RF2K-S amplifier, WSJT-X, a logger) remains on the previous band's frequency after a Band Stack recall to 160/80/60/17/10 m, until a subsequent manual tune. Observed live: an RF2K-S froze on the prior band's displayed frequency through each affected recall.
Notes
Mechanism not investigated from source — flagging the reproducible behaviour for maintainer triage rather than guessing what distinguishes the two band sets.
Independent/unrelated: the amp's RF-KIT ATU "out-of-filter" indicator appeared on 30/12/10 m, i.e. on both vfo:-emitting and vfo:-silent bands — that is amp-side filter coverage and is orthogonal to this TCI issue; mentioned only to pre-empt conflation.
Summary
Recalling a band via the Band Stack panel tunes the radio correctly but, for a deterministic fixed subset of bands — 160, 80, 60, 17, 10 m, AetherSDR emits
modulation:,rx_filter_band:,rx_volume:,lock:on the TCI server but novfo:0,0,<freq>;. The other bands (40, 30, 20, 15, 12, 6 m) emitvfo:normally. The radio itself moves to the right frequency in all cases; only the TCI frequency announcement is missing. Any TCI client that follows frequency (amplifiers, WSJT-X, loggers) is therefore stranded on the previous band's frequency after a recall to an affected band.Reproduction
Result — two full independent sweeps, identical outcome; 10 m re-verified 4×:
vfo:emitted?vfo:emitted?Silent set {160, 80, 60, 17, 10} was identical across both sweeps and rechecks — this is deterministic, not a race or intermittent.
Raw TCI excerpts
Affected band — 10 m recall (no
vfo:):Affected band — 160 m recall (no
vfo:):Working band — 12 m recall (
vfo:present):The only structural difference is the absent
vfo:0,0,<freq>;token; all other tokens are present and well-formed. A manual VFO/band-display tune from within an affected band emitsvfo:normally, confirming the gap is specific to the Band Stack recall path, not the band or frequency.Impact
Any frequency-following TCI client (e.g. an RF2K-S amplifier, WSJT-X, a logger) remains on the previous band's frequency after a Band Stack recall to 160/80/60/17/10 m, until a subsequent manual tune. Observed live: an RF2K-S froze on the prior band's displayed frequency through each affected recall.
Notes
vfo:-emitting andvfo:-silent bands — that is amp-side filter coverage and is orthogonal to this TCI issue; mentioned only to pre-empt conflation.Environment
feature/version-suffix, commit2597cd8)73, Nigel G0JKN & Claude