Skip to content

autocomplete: remove invalid example#1653

Merged
WilcoFiers merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
autocomplete-bad-example
Jul 15, 2021
Merged

autocomplete: remove invalid example#1653
WilcoFiers merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
autocomplete-bad-example

Conversation

@WilcoFiers
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This example should have been removed when we changed the rule to no longer require the autocomplete be on an appropriate input type.

Need for Final Call: 1 week

How to Review And Approve

  • Go to the “Files changed” tab
  • Here you will have the option to leave comments on different lines.
  • Once the review is completed, find the “Review changes” button in the top right, select “Approve” (if you are really confident in the rule) or "Request changes" and click “Submit review”.
  • Make sure to also review the proposed Final Call period. In case of disagreement, the longer period wins.

This example should have been removed when we changed the rule to no longer require the autocomplete be on an appropriate input type.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ajanec01 ajanec01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the original idea was to catch an input with incorrect programmatic purpose. Yes, the example is wrong but I feel that we should change it to:

<label>Email<input autocomplete="impp" /><label>

@ajanec01 ajanec01 dismissed their stale review June 22, 2021 21:30

Got it wrong

@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers added the Review Call 1 week Call for review for small changes label Jul 8, 2021
@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers merged commit 370a01e into develop Jul 15, 2021
@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers deleted the autocomplete-bad-example branch July 15, 2021 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Review Call 1 week Call for review for small changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants