Fix Moonshot model names: offer K2.5 and K2 Turbo#41
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated Moonshot entries in the benchmark script's Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
The old kimi-k2 identifier does not exist on the Moonshot API. Replace with their current lineup: - kimi-k2.5 (flagship, multimodal) - kimi-k2-turbo-preview (fast, capable) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
bd95915 to
902d0eb
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #41 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.94% 84.94%
=======================================
Files 10 10
Lines 1116 1116
=======================================
Hits 948 948
Misses 168 168
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Summary
kimi-k2identifier doesn't exist on the Moonshot API (all 50 problems returned 404)kimi-k2.5— flagship, native multimodal (Opus equivalent)kimi-k2-turbo-preview— fast, capable (Sonnet equivalent)Test plan
moonshot/kimi-k2.5and verify API calls succeedmoonshot/kimi-k2-turbo-previewand verify API calls succeed🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit