ROADMAP: add doc-consolidation side issues (#538, #539, #540)#541
Merged
Conversation
These three issues were filed during the #528 doc-consolidation brief evaluation -- elements of the brief proportionate to actual project pain, scoped separately from #528's narrower 'gate homepage numbers' core. Adding them to the ROADMAP so they're discoverable, not just issue-tracker-only. #538 (inline HTML-comment fence annotations replacing line-numbered allowlists) -> Continuous > CI tooling. Removes fix_allowlists.py which has been a recurring source of silent-duplicate-key bugs and per-PR line-shift overhead. #539 (vera builtins/effects/errors --json introspection subcommands) -> Phase 3a Agent integration. Makes Vera the source of truth for '164 built-in functions' instead of CLAUDE.md being canon. Same agent-ergonomics shape as the existing --json diagnostics. #540 (lychee + markdownlint MD051 cross-doc anchor validation) -> Continuous > CI tooling. Catches the silent-broken-link class across the 30+ markdown files that link each other's section anchors. Phase placement reflects natural fit: agent-facing compiler features in 3a; CI/tooling hygiene in Continuous. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.invalid>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughROADMAP.md updated to document planned work on a CLI compiler-introspection wrapper exposing builtins, effects, and error-code registries via structured JSON output with per-item Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #541 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.02% 91.02%
=======================================
Files 58 58
Lines 22033 22033
Branches 259 259
=======================================
Hits 20055 20055
Misses 1971 1971
Partials 7 7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds three doc-consolidation side issues filed during PR #536's review cycle to the ROADMAP, so they're discoverable in the rolling project view rather than only on the issue tracker.
The three were filed when evaluating a documentation-infrastructure consolidation brief against the project's actual pain points. Most of the brief's six phases were either out of scope for #528 (homepage numbers) or speculative — extracted only the elements proportionate to recurring pain:
fix_allowlists.py(recurring source of silent-duplicate-key bugs and per-PR line-shift overhead)vera builtins/effects/errors --json--jsondiagnosticsTest plan
Out of scope (explicitly NOT proposing)
The full brief proposed Cog-weaving facts into prose (Phase 2),
roadmap.ymlschema (Phase 4a), and avera doctororchestrator (Phase 6). All three were evaluated and consciously skipped — see #528 comment for the reasoning. This PR captures only what's proportionate to actual recurring pain.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit