Skip to content

Track 7 new issues in ROADMAP.md and KNOWN_ISSUES.md#472

Merged
aallan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
roadmap-new-issues
Apr 16, 2026
Merged

Track 7 new issues in ROADMAP.md and KNOWN_ISSUES.md#472
aallan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
roadmap-new-issues

Conversation

@aallan

@aallan aallan commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Test plan

  • All 7 issues verified as open on GitHub
  • No strikethroughs — follows project convention
  • Placement in correct roadmap phases (2c, 4a, 4c)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Track 6 missing-primitives issues (#463 IO.sleep, #465 Random effect,
#466 array utilities, #467 math built-ins, #470 string utilities,
#471 char classification) and 1 bug (#464 GC/array interaction).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.invalid>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two documentation files updated: KNOWN_ISSUES.md receives a new entry describing issue #464 regarding discrepancies between type-checked program output and runtime behaviour with suspected GC interactions. ROADMAP.md expanded with Phase 2c Random effects, Phase 4a IO.sleep, and Phase 4b standard library built-ins for arrays, mathematics, strings, and character operations.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation additions
KNOWN_ISSUES.md, ROADMAP.md
KNOWN_ISSUES.md: new entry for issue #464 describing output discrepancy in type-checked pure programs with GC-array interaction suspicion. ROADMAP.md: Random effect (Phase 2c), IO.sleep (Phase 4a), and standard library built-ins including array utilities, maths functions, string operations, and character classification (Phase 4b).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested labels

docs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: documenting 7 new issues (1 bug + 6 roadmap items) across KNOWN_ISSUES.md and ROADMAP.md.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch roadmap-new-issues

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.35%. Comparing base (f2efd93) to head (dc1fa1d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #472   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.35%   90.35%           
=======================================
  Files          50       50           
  Lines       19544    19544           
  Branches      225      225           
=======================================
  Hits        17659    17659           
  Misses       1881     1881           
  Partials        4        4           
Flag Coverage Δ
javascript 50.67% <ø> (ø)
python 95.28% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@ROADMAP.md`:
- Around line 170-173: The roadmap entries for built-ins (`#466` array_*
functions, `#467` math functions like log/sin/pi/e, `#470` string_* functions, `#471`
character classification) are placed in Phase 4c but the PR objective claims
placement in phases 3/4a/4b—reconcile by choosing the canonical schedule and
updating text accordingly: either move the four bullet items into the correct
phase sections (3, 4a, 4b) in ROADMAP.md or edit the PR objective text to state
Phase 4c as canonical, and ensure the issue references (`#466`, `#467`, `#470`, `#471`)
and the built-in names (array_sort, string_reverse, is_digit, log, etc.) are
consistent in both the roadmap bullets and the objective.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d248b8c9-358a-4161-bcbe-062ccfb8d128

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2efd93 and dc1fa1d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • KNOWN_ISSUES.md
  • ROADMAP.md

Comment thread ROADMAP.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant