Skip to content

Add run instruction for examples/http.vera in README#362

Merged
aallan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/readme-http-run
Mar 26, 2026
Merged

Add run instruction for examples/http.vera in README#362
aallan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/readme-http-run

Conversation

@aallan

@aallan aallan commented Mar 26, 2026 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

One-liner: adds — run with vera run examples/http.vera (requires network) to match the pattern used by all other example references in the README.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the HTTP example documentation with clear instructions on how to run the example and a note about its network access requirement.

@aallan
Add run instruction for examples/http.vera in README
dd18362 
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.invalid>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 26, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b5535623-49d8-4247-9adb-5e59c58677ff

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ba92c04 and dd18362.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated the examples/http.vera documentation entry in README.md to include the specific run command (vera run examples/http.vera) and an explicit note indicating network access is required.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md		 Appended run instruction and network access requirement note to the examples/http.vera documentation entry.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

docs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title accurately describes the main change: adding a run instruction for the examples/http.vera example in the README file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/readme-http-run

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 26, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.22%. Comparing base (ba92c04) to head (dd18362).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #362   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.22%   91.22%           
=======================================
  Files          48       48           
  Lines       18429    18429           
  Branches      215      215           
=======================================
  Hits        16811    16811           
  Misses       1614     1614           
  Partials        4        4
Flag Coverage Δ
javascript 55.07% <ø> (ø)
python 95.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@aallan aallan merged commit 22b6a71 into main Mar 26, 2026
17 checks passed
@aallan aallan deleted the fix/readme-http-run branch March 26, 2026 11:18
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2026
Merged
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aallan