You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Stage 11 rows in HISTORY.md have drifted into essay-length paragraphs (~240 words each) while Stage 1 through Stage 8 rows are one or two sentences. The table format was established as "short" in the early stages — detailed narrative lives in the Stage-intro paragraphs above each table, not inside the rows themselves.
v0.0.119 was shortened in PR #511 after CR caught the drift. The remaining Stage 11 entries should get the same treatment for consistency.
Rows to trim
The long-form rows in the Stage 11 table at HISTORY.md lines ~244–256:
Look at Stage 1 entries at lines ~17–25 for the shape. One sentence of "what shipped" plus a few distinctive details. No exhaustive function lists, no design rationale, no "eliminates the X pattern" flourishes — those belong in the CHANGELOG entry or the Stage-intro paragraph.
Expected diff: ~1,500 words → ~500 words across the Stage 11 table. Narrative context for the stage as a whole stays in the Stage 11 intro paragraph above the table.
Why now
Noticed during PR #511 review. CR pushed back twice on the v0.0.119 row being too long. The defence I tried ("every Stage 11 entry is a paragraph, this one matches") confused "the rows above me" with "the established format" — a local consistency check that rewarded the drift instead of catching it.
Problem
Stage 11 rows in
HISTORY.mdhave drifted into essay-length paragraphs (~240 words each) while Stage 1 through Stage 8 rows are one or two sentences. The table format was established as "short" in the early stages — detailed narrative lives in the Stage-intro paragraphs above each table, not inside the rows themselves.v0.0.119 was shortened in PR #511 after CR caught the drift. The remaining Stage 11 entries should get the same treatment for consistency.
Rows to trim
The long-form rows in the Stage 11 table at
HISTORY.mdlines ~244–256:Style target
Look at Stage 1 entries at lines ~17–25 for the shape. One sentence of "what shipped" plus a few distinctive details. No exhaustive function lists, no design rationale, no "eliminates the X pattern" flourishes — those belong in the CHANGELOG entry or the Stage-intro paragraph.
Expected diff: ~1,500 words → ~500 words across the Stage 11 table. Narrative context for the stage as a whole stays in the Stage 11 intro paragraph above the table.
Why now
Noticed during PR #511 review. CR pushed back twice on the v0.0.119 row being too long. The defence I tried ("every Stage 11 entry is a paragraph, this one matches") confused "the rows above me" with "the established format" — a local consistency check that rewarded the drift instead of catching it.