Skip to content

Dependabot: remove reviewers#258

Merged
jrfnl merged 1 commit into
1.xfrom
JRF/feature/remove-dependabot-reviewers
May 19, 2025
Merged

Dependabot: remove reviewers#258
jrfnl merged 1 commit into
1.xfrom
JRF/feature/remove-dependabot-reviewers

Conversation

@jrfnl

@jrfnl jrfnl commented May 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Support for the reviewers key in dependabot.yml files is being removed by GitHub on May 20th 2025.

The recommendation is to have a CODEOWNERS file to set reviewers instead.

For now, this commit removes the reviewers key from the dependabot.yml file without replacing it. That should prevent comments being left in PRs by the dependabot bot account about the field no longer being supported.

Ref:

@coveralls

coveralls commented May 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

coverage: 96.408%. remained the same
when pulling f351497 on JRF/feature/remove-dependabot-reviewers
into c81efd0 on 1.x.

@jrfnl jrfnl changed the base branch from 4.x to 1.x May 19, 2025 20:20
Support for the `reviewers` key in `dependabot.yml` files is being removed by GitHub on May 20th 2025.

The recommendation is to have a `CODEOWNERS` file to set reviewers instead.

For now, this commit removes the `reviewers` key from the `dependabot.yml` file without replacing it.
That should prevent comments being left in PRs by the dependabot bot account about the field no longer being supported.

Ref:
* https://github.blog/changelog/2025-04-29-dependabot-reviewers-configuration-option-being-replaced-by-code-owners/
* https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners#codeowners-file-location
@jrfnl jrfnl force-pushed the JRF/feature/remove-dependabot-reviewers branch from e084ede to f351497 Compare May 19, 2025 20:21
@jrfnl jrfnl merged commit f68a8d1 into 1.x May 19, 2025
182 of 183 checks passed
@jrfnl jrfnl deleted the JRF/feature/remove-dependabot-reviewers branch May 19, 2025 20:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants