Editorial comment: can we use wecSimInputFile.m instead of the current labeling to assist in defining there is a separate file that can be referenced. Also not possible now, but can we add a citation, link, or point to the soon to be included applications case?

First part resolved. Leaving open to add link to point to applications case when possible.

Thanks.

Editorial Comment: Request that rather than time averaged power, can we plot as capture width. Understand the point here is to see the relative difference between the green and red bars, but myself forgetting the size of the sphere and the wave conditions you have used makes the power numbers difficult to relate too. I think plotting against available wave power would also highlight how much power is needed to drive the motor relative to what is available in the waves. Also add sea state conditions for clarity.

Changed plots to capture width instead of power. I am not sure if it is better or not, but I do think it is good to see the results relative to wave power. The one thing that may be confusing is that all the other controllers documentation refers to the average power, so it may be confusing to change to capture width for only this example.

Apologies as I should have been also reviewing the other controller documentation for consistency. Then perhaps can we include both dimensional power plots and capture width for this example? The capture width plot I think is really helpful as in the unoptimized case the electrical input is 35 times the power hitting the sphere. So my request would be to have just two figures, dimensional to be consistent with other controller examples and the capture width to relate to wave climate.

No problem, I agree that having both figures provides more understanding and context, so added back the power plots. Thanks!