Merged
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
I really think we should consider updating libuv more often than we have like maybe once every 2 months or so. |
Owner
Author
|
I'm going to let this pr pass when done even though it seems python 3.9's standard asyncio loop had a little hiccup. |
Owner
Author
|
It passed the smell test for me so I'm going to merge this now. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should get us caught up with the newest version of libuv. Unrelated comment: I should really consider adding templates to our pull requests and issues similar to what aiohttp does.