Fix #95: added code conventions#161
Merged
VerisimilitudeX merged 4 commits intoVerisimilitudeX:mainfrom Oct 6, 2022
sumitbishti:sumitbisht/code-conventions
Merged
Fix #95: added code conventions#161VerisimilitudeX merged 4 commits intoVerisimilitudeX:mainfrom sumitbishti:sumitbisht/code-conventions
VerisimilitudeX merged 4 commits intoVerisimilitudeX:mainfrom
sumitbishti:sumitbisht/code-conventions
Conversation
VerisimilitudeX
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2022
Owner
VerisimilitudeX
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great! Thanks for working on this, I really appreciate your help.
Contributor
Author
Well, i had made the required changes but before that you merged the PR! |
Owner
|
@sumitbishti could you please star this repository of you haven’t already. |
Contributor
Author
Sure |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #95
@Verisimilitude11 please have a look at it.