Better costs modelling at vehicle level#788
Merged
Conversation
…as been touched by another operator.
… is too high compared to best known gain.
Collaborator
Author
|
Here is a quick summary of the results I'm getting with the state of this PR on the HVRP benchmarks I gathered.
Comments:
|
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
This PR aims at improving the way costs can be fine-tuned at vehicle level, including:
Tasks
OrOptoperator to account for fixed costs changesRouteExchangeoperator to account for fixed costs changesPdShiftoperator to account for fixed costs changesRelocateoperator to account for fixed costs changesReverseTwoOptoperator to account for fixed costs changesdocs/API.mdCHANGELOG.md