Hi,
According to the ud annotation guidelines flat seems to be the most apt relation for handling locales like "Rio de Janeiro", "Sao Paulo", "Sri Lanka", etc., but these consistently get annotated with compound relations. Is there a section of the annotation guidelines that is meant to account for this discrepancy or is this a known issue?
Also, even for English named entities, should "New York" not be tagged with flat relations? Thanks in advance for any clarification/guidance on this front.
Hi,
According to the ud annotation guidelines
flatseems to be the most apt relation for handling locales like "Rio de Janeiro", "Sao Paulo", "Sri Lanka", etc., but these consistently get annotated withcompoundrelations. Is there a section of the annotation guidelines that is meant to account for this discrepancy or is this a known issue?Also, even for English named entities, should "New York" not be tagged with
flatrelations? Thanks in advance for any clarification/guidance on this front.