Skip to content

question about the codes of evaluation #15

@ZoranGong

Description

@ZoranGong

Hi,

Thanks for your awesome work! I'm trying to reproduce SLAM-Former from scratch but I noticed that your evaluation codes are not released yet.

I believe your evaluation protocol is the same as SLAM3R, but your pre-trained weights work much worse (around 'Acc:10.809, Comp:10.182' for replica room0) than those reported in your paper when I use the same protocols... However, the tracking results look very close (around 0.032m for replica room0).

Can you provide us with your evaluation codes?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions