Feature: support different Python versions and allow flake8 plugins#33
Merged
Feature: support different Python versions and allow flake8 plugins#33
Conversation
d961008 to
d9e22b8
Compare
bd1ff5a to
a84939a
Compare
a84939a to
678ff2b
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#32 shows there is a need to support Python 3.9 too. But as explained there, upgrading everyone to 3.9 is not a good idea in my opinion.
Additionally, using a Docker Action is rather slow, especially for something as simple as this action. As luck might have it, the easiest way to solve allowing 3.9 is also to switch to a composite action, which is a lot faster in execution. So a win-win situation!