[CI] Allow to fail randomly failing behats#17690
Conversation
mpysiak
commented
Feb 25, 2025
| Q | A |
|---|---|
| Branch? | 2.0 |
| Bug fix? | no |
| New feature? | no |
| BC breaks? | no |
| Deprecations? | no |
| Related tickets | n/a |
| License | MIT |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
❌ Preview Environment deleted from BunnyshellAvailable commands:
|
|
@mpysiak can you explain why this can't be fixed via any JS driver tricks we used before? |
@Prometee, to be completely honest, we are not sure for what reason these scenarios randomly fail, we are not able to reproduce this locally and it requires more analysis, so in order not to block the builds from us and community, we want to isolate them in the first place. And then hopefully dig deeper into the problem to fix them and be able to rely on them, because at the moment we can't, which makes their value as tests negligible 🖖🏻 |