Fix ExprArithmetic's number return types#8456
Merged
Conversation
erenkarakal
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2026
GodModed
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2026
Efnilite
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
ExprArithmetic wrongly assumes that its return type is a double if one of the operands is not an integer. Which is not true in the case of a variable containing an integer value, causing a mismatch between the claimed return type (a double) and the actual returned value (a long)
Solution
Remove the logic that makes said assumption entirely.
Testing Completed
manual testing, regression test
Supporting Information
Completes: none
Related: none
AI assistance: none