Skip to content

fix django-parser's defect that it cannot handle multiline test cases.#314

Open
BoxiYu wants to merge 1 commit into
SWE-bench:mainfrom
BoxiYu:improve-parser
Open

fix django-parser's defect that it cannot handle multiline test cases.#314
BoxiYu wants to merge 1 commit into
SWE-bench:mainfrom
BoxiYu:improve-parser

Conversation

@BoxiYu

@BoxiYu BoxiYu commented Feb 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reference Issues/PRs

#275

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

It adopts a more robust log parsing algorithm for the Django log.

Any other comments?

We should build more robust parsers, I think this is important to the robsut evaluation of swebench
🧡 Thanks for contributing!

@john-b-yang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@BoxiYu Thanks so much for the fix. For changes like these, I'm going to run on all Django instances to see if the gold result comes back correctly.

@BoxiYu

BoxiYu commented May 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi John @john-b-yang , we did research on the parser and the test suite in SWE-Bench. I am happy to share that the work is accepted by ACL 2025 main. We found that (1) there are annotation errors given by the parsers' defects on the existing bench, also affecting other repositories in addition to Django, (2) many of the instances in SWE-Bench Verified still have an insufficient test suite that may. [UTBoost: Rigorous Evaluation of Coding Agents on SWE-Bench (https://github.com/CUHK-Shenzhen-SE/UTBoost)]. Maybe the bench needs an update? If there is anything I could do, I am glad to help with.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants