Online instrumentation mode#117
Conversation
ac3c91a to
1516ef5
Compare
|
The |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #117 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 41.08%
Complexity ? 321
=========================================
Files ? 68
Lines ? 2529
Branches ? 189
=========================================
Hits ? 1039
Misses ? 1425
Partials ? 65 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Signed-off-by: André Silva <andre15andre@hotmail.com>
options. Signed-off-by: André Silva <andre15andre@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: André Silva <andre15andre@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: André Silva <andre15andre@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: André Silva <andre15andre@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: André Silva <andre15andre@hotmail.com>
da15647 to
18e6ed2
Compare
|
Thank you @danglotb ! This one is ready now too. |
|
@danglotb do you have any timeline of when you will be able to review this PR? This PR is blocking ASSERT-KTH/flacoco#86, SpoonLabs/astor#323 and SpoonLabs/nopol#220 and I'd like to finish it them by the end of this week (when I finish my internship) 😅 |
|
Thanks! |
I'm working on this PR, which features a new mode for getting the covered test results through online instrumentation, instead of through offline instrumentation as it is the case of all modes right now.
The advantages are:
includesandexcludes, we can optimize the analysis/instrumentation without any PR tojacoco. Related to Optimize coverage analysis #111The PR's main work is finished. Tomorrow I'll finish adding tests and testing the remaining integration with
flacocoand other tools.Early feedback is appreciated though, specifically if you want to merge some
test-runnermodes.