Skip to content

SPEC: require reasonably up to date 'libldb' version#8240

Merged
alexey-tikhonov merged 1 commit intoSSSD:masterfrom
alexey-tikhonov:libldb-ver
Nov 26, 2025
Merged

SPEC: require reasonably up to date 'libldb' version#8240
alexey-tikhonov merged 1 commit intoSSSD:masterfrom
alexey-tikhonov:libldb-ver

Conversation

@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

Since 'libldb' is built from Samba sources, it uses the same version.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request strengthens the runtime dependency of the sssd-common package on libldb. By adding a version requirement (>= %{samba_package_version}), it ensures that the installed libldb is at least as new as the samba-devel package used during the build. This is a good improvement as it prevents potential ABI compatibility issues at runtime, given that libldb is versioned in lockstep with Samba. The change is consistent with existing versioned dependencies on samba-client-libs in other SSSD subpackages. The implementation is correct and I see no issues.

Copy link
Contributor

@sumit-bose sumit-bose left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi,

thank you for the patch, makes sense, and backporting to 2-9 (RHEL-9) should be ok as well, ACK.

@alexey-tikhonov alexey-tikhonov added the Trivial A single reviewer is sufficient to review the Pull Request label Nov 25, 2025
@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member Author

C10S CI is red due to known issue:

cat: \'/tmp/tmp.wcxPRF6nyH/audit/audit.log*\': No such file or directory\n'

Since 'libldb' is built from Samba sources, it uses the same version.

Reviewed-by: Sumit Bose <sbose@redhat.com>
@sssd-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The pull request was accepted by @alexey-tikhonov with the following PR CI status:


🟢 CodeFactor (success)
🟢 CodeQL (success)
🟢 osh-diff-scan:fedora-rawhide-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:centos-stream-10-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 Analyze (target) / cppcheck (success)
🟢 Build / freebsd (success)
🟢 Build / make-distcheck (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (centos-10) (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (fedora-41) (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (fedora-42) (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (fedora-43) (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (fedora-44) (success)
🟢 ci / prepare (success)
🔴 ci / system (centos-10) (failure)
🟢 ci / system (fedora-41) (success)
🟢 ci / system (fedora-42) (success)
🟢 ci / system (fedora-43) (success)
🟢 ci / system (fedora-44) (success)
➖ Coverity scan / coverity (skipped)
🟢 Static code analysis / codeql (success)
🟢 Static code analysis / pre-commit (success)
🟢 Static code analysis / python-system-tests (success)


There are unsuccessful or unfinished checks. Make sure that the failures are not related to this pull request before merging.

@alexey-tikhonov alexey-tikhonov merged commit bbbd150 into SSSD:master Nov 26, 2025
11 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Accepted backport-to-sssd-2-9 Trivial A single reviewer is sufficient to review the Pull Request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants