Skip to content

Conversation

@atanasdb
Copy link

@atanasdb atanasdb commented May 3, 2023

No description provided.

@smititelu
Copy link
Contributor

I can argue against this fix with the following: "for" loop for next port will be ran much more loops :D. Please have a look on PR #635

@lemenkov
Copy link
Member

@atanasdb thanks for the PR and sorry fr the hiatus. Unfortunately we'd better go with PR #635 so I am closing this.

@lemenkov lemenkov closed this Jan 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants