Skip to content

Conversation

@valentjn
Copy link
Member

@valentjn valentjn commented Oct 15, 2019

The combigrid module currently has some usability issues, see #141. This is a proposal for a redesigned combigrid module with improved usability. Since it's written from scratch, a lot of features of the old module are currently missing in this draft.

Current TODO list:

  • More examples
  • More tests

Closes #141.

@valentjn
Copy link
Member Author

Tagging @MichaelReh and @freifrauvonbleifrei as main users/CT experts.

@valentjn valentjn marked this pull request as ready for review October 28, 2019 08:29
@valentjn
Copy link
Member Author

Apart from some suggestions, I didn't hear any fundamental objections in the discussion last Thursday. Will this be merged then? Otherwise I fear that this PR dies when I'm leaving the group. Missing features can be implemented by students.

@valentjn
Copy link
Member Author

I would really appreciate if we could merge this. Pretty sure it will soon get worse than the 83 commits it's already behind master after half a month. I cannot maintain this branch long-term parallel to master...

MichaelReh
MichaelReh previously approved these changes Nov 18, 2019
valentjn and others added 2 commits November 19, 2019 20:14
Otherwise this clashes with OperationEval::eval(
const DataMatrix& alpha, const DataVector& point,
DataVector& value) as both DataVector and DataMatrix are
std::vector<double>s.
@MichaelReh MichaelReh merged commit db3cc3d into master Nov 19, 2019
@MichaelReh MichaelReh deleted the feature-combigrid branch November 19, 2019 22:29
@leiterrl leiterrl added this to the v3.3.0 milestone Mar 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Usability of Combigrid Module

4 participants