Skip to content

Conversation

@slievrly
Copy link
Contributor

@slievrly slievrly commented Jun 27, 2019

Simplify unit tests by using the more appropriate JUnit assert methods.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 27, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #6546 into 2.x will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #6546      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     98.27%   98.23%   -0.05%     
+ Complexity     6336     6334       -2     
============================================
  Files           677      677              
  Lines         45486    45486              
  Branches       6319     6319              
============================================
- Hits          44702    44682      -20     
- Misses          241      253      +12     
- Partials        543      551       +8
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/main/java/io/reactivex/Notification.java 93.93% <0%> (-6.07%) 22% <0%> (-1%)
...nternal/operators/observable/ObservableCreate.java 93.16% <0%> (-4.28%) 2% <0%> (ø)
...nternal/operators/parallel/ParallelReduceFull.java 91.08% <0%> (-3.97%) 2% <0%> (ø)
...ternal/operators/observable/ObservablePublish.java 94.73% <0%> (-3.51%) 12% <0%> (ø)
...ernal/operators/flowable/FlowableFlatMapMaybe.java 93.23% <0%> (-2.42%) 2% <0%> (ø)
...ava/io/reactivex/processors/BehaviorProcessor.java 96.86% <0%> (-2.25%) 60% <0%> (ø)
.../operators/observable/ObservableFlatMapSingle.java 88.8% <0%> (-2.24%) 2% <0%> (ø)
.../io/reactivex/disposables/CompositeDisposable.java 98.14% <0%> (-1.86%) 39% <0%> (-1%)
...perators/single/SingleFlatMapIterableFlowable.java 95.83% <0%> (-1.67%) 2% <0%> (ø)
...rnal/operators/flowable/FlowableFlatMapSingle.java 92.93% <0%> (-1.64%) 2% <0%> (ø)
... and 22 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0df3285...b7ba8ba. Read the comment docs.

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

How did you detect these?

Could you also post these PRs against 3.x too?

@slievrly
Copy link
Contributor Author

@akarnokd I detected it through IDEA's Inspect Code plugin, and it works fine if it passes the unit test.
I can also submit this unit test simplified pr to 3.x

@akarnokd akarnokd added this to the 2.2 backlog milestone Jun 27, 2019
@akarnokd akarnokd changed the title simplify junit 2.x: Simplify JUnit tests with more appropriate assert methods Jun 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants