tests: gnrc_sixlowpan: replace default netif with dummy#9648
tests: gnrc_sixlowpan: replace default netif with dummy#9648miri64 merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
Conversation
|
I do not have the Segmentation Fault on It now fails in the same way as on @jia200x and @jcarrano could you also test this PR as it was producing hardfault and assertion failed on the board you tested: RIOT-OS/Release-Specs#65 (comment) |
On |
It is failing reliably on my side so it could help debugging. |
|
I think I fixed it: #9649 |
a15c342 to
94cd178
Compare
|
Rebased to current master to include #9649. |
tests/gnrc_sixlowpan/Makefile
Outdated
| nucleo-f031k6 nucleo-f042k6 nucleo-f070rb \ | ||
| nucleo-f070rb nucleo-f303k8 nucleo-f334r8 \ | ||
| nucleo-l031k6 nucleo-l053r8 stm32f0discovery \ | ||
| telosb wsn430-v1_3b wsn430-v1_4 z1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hifive1 and nuclo-f072rb were added, because previously they did not pull in a radio, so now with the dummy device the RAM overflows.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oops, actually missed to add the nucleo-f072rb
Use a minimalistic dummy instead of the default interface for testing the `gnrc_sixlowpan` module Currently the default interface is used which leads to problems with this test, since random traffic on the medium might lead to failed results.
a083e0f to
6c2510d
Compare
|
Squashed |
|
Backport provided in #9676. |
Contribution description
Use a minimalistic dummy instead of the default interface for testing
the
gnrc_sixlowpanmoduleCurrently the default interface is used which leads to problems with
this test, since random traffic on the medium might lead to failed
results.
Issues/PRs references
None