Closed
Conversation
Signed-off-by: dlad <dylan.laduranty@mesotic.com>
Contributor
|
I don't have the board anymore... @haukepetersen ? |
Contributor
Member
Author
|
Hi @haukepetersen, |
Contributor
|
perfect: I just opened #6223 to improve the sam0 structure and clarity a bit -> would you maybe mind to have a look at those changes?! |
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add I2C support to SAML21 & SAML21-Xplained board
Most of the change are located in the i2c init function, saml21 and samd21 don't have the same clock management.
I added specific init function for saml21 under the sam21_common directory. Maybe it was not the best way to do it. Any thoughts ?