I just want to check the CI output first to see what the state is. It looks like there is some radio work done but maybe that would be better to add in another PR (especially since I think it would also be testing the boards with radios such as the samr)

Some discussion was had about how saul_default should select things and we reached some conclusion that generally the HAVE_x in the board definition should be responsible for selecting the x part if saul_default is enabled but that will be implemented in a different PR.

finally got it working... ignore the bot

Lets see what murdock says.

There we go, so I just removed the submac test as we are not adding netdev for this PR.

Rebased and fixed the DEVELHELP export (and added some documentation on the variable).

ping @fjmolinas

To test changes

cd tests/ieee802154_hal
export BOARD=remote-revb
make clean && DEVELHELP=0 TEST_KCONFIG=1 make info-modules | grep mpu
#Should be empty
make clean && TEST_KCONFIG=1 make info-modules | grep mpu
#Should have mpu_stack_guard

You can repeat without TEST_KCONFIG to verify it is the same with make.

Rebased and fixed the DEVELHELP export (and added some documentation on the variable).

ping @fjmolinas

To test changes

cd tests/ieee802154_hal
export BOARD=remote-revb
make clean && DEVELHELP=0 TEST_KCONFIG=1 make info-modules | grep mpu
#Should be empty
make clean && TEST_KCONFIG=1 make info-modules | grep mpu
#Should have mpu_stack_guard

You can repeat without TEST_KCONFIG to verify it is the same with make.

Look good to me, IMO you can squash, any remaining concerns @leandrolanzieri?

any remaining concerns @leandrolanzieri?

None, it looks good to me!

There seems to be an unrelated issue on the CI

There seems to be an unrelated issue on the CI

Seems like some kind of lack of space issue.. re-triggered

Thanks for the review and handholding :)