Skip to content

boards/atmega128x-based: Model features in Kconfig#14208

Merged
PeterKietzmann merged 6 commits intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
leandrolanzieri:pr/kconfig/atmega128x_boards_symbols
Jun 22, 2020
Merged

boards/atmega128x-based: Model features in Kconfig#14208
PeterKietzmann merged 6 commits intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
leandrolanzieri:pr/kconfig/atmega128x_boards_symbols

Conversation

@leandrolanzieri
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@leandrolanzieri leandrolanzieri commented Jun 4, 2020

Contribution description

This models the features in Kconfig for all the boards based on the atmega1281 and atmega1284p CPUs.
The first commit is from #14176, included for testing.

Testing procedure

  • tests/kconfig_features should pass for:
    • atmega1284p
    • mega-xplained
    • waspmote-pro

Issues/PRs references

Depends on #14176

@leandrolanzieri leandrolanzieri added Type: new feature The issue requests / The PR implemements a new feature for RIOT Area: Kconfig Area: Kconfig integration labels Jun 4, 2020
@leandrolanzieri leandrolanzieri added the State: waiting for other PR State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first label Jun 5, 2020
@leandrolanzieri leandrolanzieri force-pushed the pr/kconfig/atmega128x_boards_symbols branch from d9e8e5f to c77c75f Compare June 17, 2020 11:01
@leandrolanzieri leandrolanzieri removed the State: waiting for other PR State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first label Jun 17, 2020
@leandrolanzieri
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Rebased and adapted to new classification

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@PeterKietzmann PeterKietzmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please rebase after #14203 got merged. I've reviewed the Makefiles & Kconfig files manually and ran tests/kconfig_features for the three boards -> looks alright. ACK

@PeterKietzmann PeterKietzmann added Reviewed: 1-fundamentals The fundamentals of the PR were reviewed according to the maintainer guidelines Reviewed: 2-code-design The code design of the PR was reviewed according to the maintainer guidelines Reviewed: 3-testing The PR was tested according to the maintainer guidelines Reviewed: 4-code-style The adherence to coding conventions by the PR were reviewed according to the maintainer guidelines Reviewed: 5-documentation The documentation details of the PR were reviewed according to the maintainer guidelines labels Jun 22, 2020
@leandrolanzieri leandrolanzieri added this to the Release 2020.07 milestone Jun 22, 2020
@leandrolanzieri leandrolanzieri force-pushed the pr/kconfig/atmega128x_boards_symbols branch from c77c75f to 819efea Compare June 22, 2020 15:12
@PeterKietzmann PeterKietzmann added the CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR label Jun 22, 2020
@PeterKietzmann PeterKietzmann merged commit d191b9c into RIOT-OS:master Jun 22, 2020
@leandrolanzieri leandrolanzieri deleted the pr/kconfig/atmega128x_boards_symbols branch June 22, 2020 16:35
@leandrolanzieri
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for reviewing !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area: Kconfig Area: Kconfig integration CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR Reviewed: 1-fundamentals The fundamentals of the PR were reviewed according to the maintainer guidelines Reviewed: 2-code-design The code design of the PR was reviewed according to the maintainer guidelines Reviewed: 3-testing The PR was tested according to the maintainer guidelines Reviewed: 4-code-style The adherence to coding conventions by the PR were reviewed according to the maintainer guidelines Reviewed: 5-documentation The documentation details of the PR were reviewed according to the maintainer guidelines Type: new feature The issue requests / The PR implemements a new feature for RIOT

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants