-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
timex: macro names are misleading #4211
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
Discussion: RFCThe issue/PR is used as a discussion starting point about the item of the issue/PRThe issue/PR is used as a discussion starting point about the item of the issue/PRType: enhancementThe issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentationThe issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Discussion: RFCThe issue/PR is used as a discussion starting point about the item of the issue/PRThe issue/PR is used as a discussion starting point about the item of the issue/PRType: enhancementThe issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentationThe issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation
Am I the only one that thinks the name of
SEC_IN_USEC,SEC_IN_MS,MS_IN_USEC, andUSEC_IN_NSare somewhat missleading?SEC, some withS