Skip to content

Observation/FOUR-13960: Server error when using sort ascending or descending in taps, process categories, templates#6126

Merged
ryancooley merged 1 commit intonextfrom
observation/FOUR-13960
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Observation/FOUR-13960: Server error when using sort ascending or descending in taps, process categories, templates#6126
ryancooley merged 1 commit intonextfrom
observation/FOUR-13960

Conversation

@agustinbusso
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agustinbusso agustinbusso commented Jan 31, 2024

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Steps to reproduced:

  • Go to processes
  • Click on template tab
  • Sort a column ascendingly or descendingly
  • Click on option to sort ascending or descending of the unlabeled column.

Current Behavior:
The option option to sort ascending or descending is displayed and when you click it, a server error is displayed.

Expected Behavior:
This ascendingly or descendingly option should not be displayed in this column.

Solution

  • Check if column is sortable in templates and categories.

How to Test

Follow steps above

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:next
ci:deploy

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No Coverage information No data about Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

@gustavobascope gustavobascope self-requested a review January 31, 2024 15:35
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gustavobascope gustavobascope left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No observations

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit 6541f87 into next Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants