Skip to content

FOUR-13376:Type of letter of the square’s title are not the same as figma in Designer Welcome Screen#6106

Merged
ryancooley merged 1 commit intonextfrom
bugfix/FOUR-13376
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

FOUR-13376:Type of letter of the square’s title are not the same as figma in Designer Welcome Screen#6106
ryancooley merged 1 commit intonextfrom
bugfix/FOUR-13376

Conversation

@fagubla
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fagubla fagubla commented Jan 29, 2024 •
edited by pmPaulis
Loading

Issue & Reproduction Steps

The Type of letter of the section’s title don’t look the same as Figma:

Solution

  • Apply the same styles defined in figma

How to Test

Login and Go to Designer

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy
ci:next

@tokensPM
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tokensPM commented Jan 29, 2024

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-86def28732.engk8s.processmaker.net

@tokensPM
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tokensPM commented Jan 29, 2024

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-86def28732.engk8s.processmaker.net

@gitguardian
Copy link
Copy Markdown

gitguardian bot commented Jan 31, 2024 •
edited
Loading

️✅ There are no secrets present in this pull request anymore.

If these secrets were true positive and are still valid, we highly recommend you to revoke them.
Once a secret has been leaked into a git repository, you should consider it compromised, even if it was deleted immediately.
Find here more information about risks.

🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Our GitHub checks need improvements? Share your feedbacks!

@tokensPM
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tokensPM commented Jan 31, 2024

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-86def28732.engk8s.processmaker.net

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link
Copy Markdown

processmaker-sonarqube bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No Coverage information No data about Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

@tokensPM
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tokensPM commented Jan 31, 2024

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-86def28732.engk8s.processmaker.net

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit 6b9e913 into next Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pmPaulis pmPaulis pmPaulis approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@fagubla @tokensPM @pmPaulis @ryancooley