Skip to content

Start-PSPester: argument completer for -Path#17334

Merged
iSazonov merged 2 commits intoPowerShell:masterfrom
powercode:build_test_completer
May 25, 2022
Merged

Start-PSPester: argument completer for -Path#17334
iSazonov merged 2 commits intoPowerShell:masterfrom
powercode:build_test_completer

Conversation

@powercode
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR Summary

Adds completion of test files to the Path parameter of Start-PSPester

PR Context

Makes it easier to run a single test file.

PR Checklist

Co-authored-by: Steve Lee <slee@microsoft.com>
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 1 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -0
Percentile : 0.4%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.psm1 : +1 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@ghost ghost added the Review - Needed The PR is being reviewed label May 24, 2022
@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ghost commented May 24, 2022

This pull request has been automatically marked as Review Needed because it has been there has not been any activity for 7 days.
Maintainer, please provide feedback and/or mark it as Waiting on Author

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@PaulHigin PaulHigin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@iSazonov iSazonov added the CL-Tools Indicates that a PR should be marked as a tools change in the Change Log label May 25, 2022
@iSazonov iSazonov merged commit 80a2071 into PowerShell:master May 25, 2022
@ghost ghost removed the Review - Needed The PR is being reviewed label May 25, 2022
@powercode powercode deleted the build_test_completer branch May 25, 2022 09:28
@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ghost commented Jun 22, 2022

🎉v7.3.0-preview.5 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CL-Tools Indicates that a PR should be marked as a tools change in the Change Log Extra Small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants