Skip to content

fix(pingcap/tiflash): fix builder image#487

Merged
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/update-tiflash-builder-2
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

fix(pingcap/tiflash): fix builder image#487
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/update-tiflash-builder-2

Conversation

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor

@wuhuizuo wuhuizuo commented Nov 7, 2024

With the new version of tiflash builder to improve the performance of the artifacts.

Ref: pingcap/tiflash#9587

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo wuhuizuo@126.com

With the new version of tiflash builder to improve the performance of the artifacts.

Ref: pingcap/tiflash#9587

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <wuhuizuo@126.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from purelind November 7, 2024 09:53
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 7, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title and description, it seems that the changes are related to fixing the builder image for the pingcap/tiflash repository. The diff provided shows that the builder image has been updated to a new version (v2024.11.7) to improve the performance of the artifacts.

One potential problem I can see is that there is no mention of any testing or verification that has been done to ensure that the new builder image works as expected. It is important to make sure that the changes made do not introduce any new problems or regressions.

To address this, the pull request author should provide more details on the testing that has been done or planned. They can also consider adding automated tests to verify the functionality of the new builder image.

In addition, it would be helpful to provide some context on why this particular version of the builder image was chosen and what benefits it provides over the previous version.

Overall, the changes seem reasonable, but it is important to ensure that proper testing and verification has been done before merging the pull request.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Nov 7, 2024
@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor Author

wuhuizuo commented Nov 7, 2024

/cc @Lloyd-Pottiger

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from Lloyd-Pottiger November 7, 2024 09:54
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 7, 2024

@Lloyd-Pottiger: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor Author

wuhuizuo commented Nov 7, 2024

/approve

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 7, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Lloyd-Pottiger, wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Nov 7, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 9b290f7 into main Nov 7, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the fix/update-tiflash-builder-2 branch November 7, 2024 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants