Merged
Conversation
Includes comment alignment, and added RESERVE(6), RESERVE(10), RELEASE(6) and RELEASE(10) for SCSI, along with RESERVE(16) and RELEASE(17) for SASI.
Collaborator
Author
|
I think I understand now the value of uploading smaller changes. I should have separated the code alignment into a it's own request, then the RESERVE/RELEASE into it's own request. If needed, I can do that, just let me know. |
akuker
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2021
Member
akuker
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All changes look good. Re-ran robot tests and all pass. Thank you for the pull request, phrax0!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Various code and comment alignment, and added RESERVE(6), RESERVE(10), RELEASE(6) and RELEASE(10) for SCSI, along with RESERVE(16) and RELEASE(17) for SASI. All feedback is appreciated. It feels like I'm doing this wrong, but the code does compile successfully and appears to work.