Skip to content

Run Python static analysis only in Web workflow#1281

Closed
rdmark wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
rdmark-sonar-split
Closed

Run Python static analysis only in Web workflow#1281
rdmark wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
rdmark-sonar-split

Conversation

@rdmark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rdmark rdmark commented Nov 1, 2023

No description provided.

@rdmark rdmark force-pushed the rdmark-sonar-split branch from 04b0524 to 28034a0 Compare November 1, 2023 12:13
@uweseimet uweseimet self-requested a review November 1, 2023 12:21
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 1, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@rdmark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

rdmark commented Nov 1, 2023

@uweseimet As far as I can tell, what happens when two Sonar analysis jobs runs on the same PR / branch, the one that finishes later will overwrite the one that finishes earlier in the Sonarcloud database. Namely, the C++ analysis will always overwrite the Python analysis, since the former takes a lot longer time.

If I'm not mistaken, this means that when the PR is later merged into develop, the develop branch report on Sonarcloud will only ever contain the analysis of the C++ code. This is not what we want, I think. I suggest we discard this PR in favor of #1280

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants