-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 278
fix(playground): corrected typo #2703
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughUpdates configuration and documentation for the playground environment. Modifies Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
playground/README.md (1)
8-13: Consider separating the PATH instruction for clarity.The prerequisites section is well-structured. However, line 11 combines the installation command with a PATH note in a parenthetical. Consider formatting it as separate bullets for improved readability.
🔎 Suggested formatting improvement
-* cargo install wasm-opt --locked (and make sure it is in your path) +* cargo install wasm-opt --locked +* Ensure `wasm-opt` is in your PATH
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.gitignore(1 hunks)playground/README.md(3 hunks)playground/src/layout/main-layout.js(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Test with Coverage
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
- GitHub Check: Scan Container for Vulnerabilities
- GitHub Check: Test with Coverage
🔇 Additional comments (3)
playground/src/layout/main-layout.js (1)
278-278: LGTM! Grammatical improvement.The addition of the article "the" improves the text phrasing and aligns with standard English grammar.
.gitignore (1)
28-31: LGTM! Proper exclusion of build artifacts.The changes correctly ignore macOS system files and WebAssembly build artifacts. The
.DS_Storepattern is now in standard unescaped format, and the wasm files align with the development workflow documented in the README.playground/README.md (1)
45-46: LGTM! Helpful user-facing note.This addition sets proper expectations about the Monaco editor errors and provides clear instructions for dismissing them. Good documentation improvement for developer experience.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2703 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.59% 82.56% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 74 74
Lines 8125 8125
==========================================
- Hits 6710 6708 -2
- Misses 901 902 +1
- Partials 514 515 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Also updated the readme with more details and added generated files to .gitignore.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Style
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.