Skip to content

Conversation

@tolgaozen
Copy link
Member

@tolgaozen tolgaozen commented Nov 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced test coverage for data reader and schema reader components, including error handling validation, context cancellation scenarios, and concurrent request testing to ensure robust system behavior under failure conditions.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 23, 2025

Walkthrough

Two test files in the singleflight package received expanded test coverage for error-handling scenarios. New mock types (ErrorMockDataReader and ErrorMockSchemaReader) were introduced to simulate delegate failures, with corresponding test cases validating error propagation, context cancellation, and concurrent error handling.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Data Reader Tests
internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/data_reader_test.go
Added ErrorMockDataReader type that overrides HeadSnapshot to return errors. Introduced tests for constructor validation, delegation verification, error propagation, context cancellation, and concurrent error scenarios.
Schema Reader Tests
internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/schema_reader_test.go
Added ErrorMockSchemaReader type that overrides HeadVersion to return errors. Introduced tests for constructor validation, delegation verification, error propagation, context cancellation, and concurrent error scenarios.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Both changes follow identical parallel patterns (mock type + error method override + test cases)
  • Test-only modifications with minimal logic complexity
  • No production code changes or architectural impacts
  • Primary review focus: verify test cases exercise intended error paths and assertions are correct

Poem

🐰 With tests of error, brave and true,
Mock delegates that fail on cue,
Cancellations, concurrent calls so grand—
Singleflight's robustness, all well-planned! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The PR title mentions only DataReader tests, but the changes also include comprehensive SchemaReader tests with similar coverage patterns. Update the title to reflect both DataReader and SchemaReader test additions, e.g., 'test(singleflight): add unit tests for DataReader and SchemaReader functionality'.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch add-singleflight-data-reader-tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/data_reader_test.go (1)

315-341: Concurrent error handling test looks solid.

The test correctly verifies that errors are broadcast to all concurrent requests waiting on the same singleflight call. Proper use of sync.WaitGroup and atomic operations ensures race-free counting.

Optionally, you could also verify that only one call reaches the delegate (similar to the successful case tests), which would more completely validate the singleflight behavior under error conditions. However, the current test adequately validates the error broadcasting mechanism.

internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/schema_reader_test.go (1)

295-321: Concurrent error test correctly validates error broadcasting.

The test properly verifies that all concurrent goroutines waiting on the same singleflight call receive the error. Good use of atomic operations and WaitGroups for synchronization.

Similar to the DataReader tests, you could optionally add verification that only one delegate call is made, which would provide more complete coverage of singleflight behavior under error conditions.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c933e2 and 5a74d28.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/data_reader_test.go (5 hunks)
  • internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/schema_reader_test.go (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/schema_reader_test.go (3)
internal/storage/storage.go (2)
  • NoopSchemaReader (124-124)
  • NewNoopSchemaReader (126-128)
internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/schema_reader.go (1)
  • NewSchemaReader (20-22)
pkg/database/pagination.go (1)
  • Pagination (21-24)
internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/data_reader_test.go (3)
internal/storage/storage.go (2)
  • NoopDataReader (42-42)
  • NewNoopRelationshipReader (44-46)
internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/data_reader.go (1)
  • NewDataReader (21-23)
pkg/database/pagination.go (2)
  • CursorPagination (52-56)
  • Pagination (21-24)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Test with Coverage
  • GitHub Check: Scan Container for Vulnerabilities
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
  • GitHub Check: Test with Coverage
🔇 Additional comments (12)
internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/data_reader_test.go (6)

5-5: LGTM!

The new imports support error handling tests and parameter types for the delegation tests.

Also applies to: 14-15


51-58: LGTM!

The ErrorMockDataReader correctly simulates delegate failures for error-handling tests. The implementation is clean and consistent with the existing MockDataReader pattern.


82-97: LGTM!

The constructor tests properly verify both normal initialization and nil-delegate handling, ensuring the wrapper doesn't panic with invalid input.


99-181: Delegation tests provide good coverage of the proxy methods.

These tests verify that the DataReader wrapper correctly delegates to the underlying reader for all relationship and attribute operations. Using NoopRelationshipReader is appropriate for testing the delegation mechanism without requiring complex test fixtures.


294-302: LGTM!

The error propagation test correctly verifies that delegate errors are properly surfaced through the singleflight wrapper.


304-313: Context cancellation test is appropriately scoped.

The test correctly focuses on ensuring no panic occurs with a cancelled context. The comment acknowledges that the specific behavior depends on the singleflight implementation and timing, which is a reasonable limitation for this test.

internal/storage/proxies/singleflight/schema_reader_test.go (6)

5-5: LGTM!

Import additions are necessary for the new error handling and delegation tests.

Also applies to: 14-14


49-56: LGTM!

The ErrorMockSchemaReader implementation is correct and mirrors the pattern used in ErrorMockDataReader, ensuring consistency across the test suite.


80-95: LGTM!

Constructor tests properly validate both standard initialization and edge cases like nil delegates.


97-161: Delegation tests are well-documented and comprehensive.

These tests verify that SchemaReader correctly delegates to the underlying reader. The comments documenting NoopSchemaReader behavior (empty version strings, nil returns) are particularly helpful for understanding the test expectations.


274-282: LGTM!

Error propagation test correctly validates that delegate errors surface through the singleflight wrapper.


284-293: Context cancellation handling is appropriately tested.

The test ensures no panic with cancelled contexts, which is the critical behavior. The comment appropriately acknowledges that exact behavior depends on timing and singleflight implementation details.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.51%. Comparing base (7c933e2) to head (5a74d28).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2649      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.21%   82.51%   +0.29%     
==========================================
  Files          74       74              
  Lines        8132     8132              
==========================================
+ Hits         6686     6710      +24     
+ Misses        929      906      -23     
+ Partials      517      516       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@tolgaozen tolgaozen merged commit a999206 into master Nov 23, 2025
15 checks passed
@tolgaozen tolgaozen deleted the add-singleflight-data-reader-tests branch November 23, 2025 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants