Skip to content

Conversation

@tolgaozen
Copy link
Member

@tolgaozen tolgaozen commented Jan 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated API documentation version from v1.2.8 to v1.2.9 across multiple files
    • Consistent version increment in Swagger JSON, OpenAPI specification, and internal version tracking
  • Chores

    • Routine version number update for the project

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request primarily focuses on updating the version number from "v1.2.8" to "v1.2.9" across multiple files in the Permify project. The changes are consistent across API documentation files (Swagger JSON), internal version constant, and OpenAPI proto specification. The modifications appear to be a standard version increment without introducing any functional changes to the codebase.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/api-reference/apidocs.swagger.json Version updated from "v1.2.8" to "v1.2.9"
docs/api-reference/openapiv2/apidocs.swagger.json Version updated from "v1.2.8" to "v1.2.9"
internal/info.go Version constant updated from "v1.2.8" to "v1.2.9"
proto/base/v1/openapi.proto Version updated from "v1.2.8" to "v1.2.9"
pkg/cmd/serve.go Added checker variable using cache.NewCheckEngineWithCache

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Version bumps, a rabbit's delight,
Numbers dancing, climbing just right
From eight to nine, we softly leap
A version update, smooth and sleek
Permify grows with gentle might! 🚀

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/cmd/serve.go (1)

438-442: Improved caching implementation by moving it before distributed mode check.

The refactoring improves the code by ensuring consistent caching behavior regardless of the distributed mode. This change eliminates potential code duplication and standardizes the caching layer's initialization.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e041ca4 and d3dedb8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pkg/pb/base/v1/openapi.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • docs/api-reference/apidocs.swagger.json (1 hunks)
  • docs/api-reference/openapiv2/apidocs.swagger.json (1 hunks)
  • internal/info.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/cmd/serve.go (1 hunks)
  • proto/base/v1/openapi.proto (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • internal/info.go
  • proto/base/v1/openapi.proto
  • docs/api-reference/openapiv2/apidocs.swagger.json
  • docs/api-reference/apidocs.swagger.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test with Coverage
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pkg/cmd/serve.go (1)

452-452: Verify distributed mode compatibility with cached checker.

The cached checker is now being passed to the balancer. While this change makes the code more consistent, we should ensure that the caching layer works correctly in a distributed environment.

✅ Verification successful

Cache implementation is compatible with distributed mode

The current implementation is safe for distributed operation because:

  • The balancer ensures consistent routing of similar requests to the same node through hash-based partitioning
  • Each node maintains its own independent cache
  • No cross-node cache synchronization is needed as the balancer's consistent hashing guarantees that identical permission checks are always routed to the same node
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any existing issues or discussions about cache consistency in distributed mode
rg -i "cache.+distributed|distributed.+cache" -g "*.{go,md}"

# Look for any cache-related configurations in distributed mode
rg -i "distributed.*cache.*config|cache.*config.*distributed" -g "*.{go,md,yaml,json}"

Length of output: 151


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for distributed mode configuration and implementation
rg -i "distributed.*mode|mode.*distributed" -g "*.{go,md,yaml,json}" -A 3

# Find checker implementation and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
  $$$
  checker $$$
  $$$
}'

# Look for balancer implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
  $$$
  balancer $$$
  $$$
}'

# Search for cache-related configurations
rg -i "cache.*config|config.*cache" -g "*.{go,yaml,json}" -A 2

Length of output: 7518


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine cache implementation details
cat internal/engines/cache/check.go

# Look for cache invalidation or synchronization
rg -i "invalidate|sync|distributed" internal/engines/cache/

# Check balancer's interaction with checker
cat internal/engines/balancer/balancer.go

Length of output: 10239

@tolgaozen tolgaozen merged commit 977cf63 into master Jan 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@tolgaozen tolgaozen deleted the update-version-v1-2-9 branch January 29, 2025 11:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants