Skip to content

Conversation

@tolgaozen
Copy link
Member

@tolgaozen tolgaozen commented Jan 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated API documentation version from v1.2.4 to v1.2.5 across multiple files
    • Updated Swagger and OpenAPI specification version numbers
  • Chores

    • Internal version number incremented in core software files
  • Security

    • Improved random number generation using cryptographically secure methods in PostgreSQL utility functions

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request involves a version update from v1.2.4 to v1.2.5 across multiple files in the Permify project. The changes primarily focus on updating version numbers in documentation and internal version tracking files. Additionally, there's a notable enhancement in the PostgreSQL storage utility, where random number generation has been improved by switching to a more secure cryptographic random number generation method.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/api-reference/apidocs.swagger.json Version updated from v1.2.4 to v1.2.5
docs/api-reference/openapiv2/apidocs.swagger.json Version updated from v1.2.4 to v1.2.5
internal/info.go Version constant updated from v1.2.4 to v1.2.5
proto/base/v1/openapi.proto Version updated from v1.2.4 to v1.2.5
internal/storage/postgres/utils/common.go Added secureRandomFloat64() function using crypto/rand for secure random generation

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Code as Source Code
    participant Rand as crypto/rand
    participant Util as WaitWithBackoff
    
    Code->>Util: Call with retry parameters
    Util->>Rand: Generate secure random float
    Rand-->>Util: Return cryptographically secure random value
    Util->>Util: Calculate jittered backoff
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Version Verse 🐰

From v1.2.4 to v1.2.5 we leap,
Secure random numbers, our promise we keep.
Docs updated with precision so bright,
A version bump that feels just right!
Hop, hop, hooray for code so clean! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
internal/storage/postgres/utils/common.go (2)

166-170: Optional enhancement: include more context in logs.
Consider adding the retry attempt number and maximum backoff thresholds to the log statements for improved observability.


178-185: Consider improved error handling in secureRandomFloat64.
Currently, it returns 0 on read failure, which might cause repeated immediate retries with minimal jitter. Logging or retrying the rand.Read call could provide better visibility or resilience.

 func secureRandomFloat64() float64 {
 	var b [8]byte
 	if _, err := rand.Read(b[:]); err != nil {
-		return 0 // Default to 0 jitter on error
+		slog.Error("Failed to generate secure random bytes", slog.String("error", err.Error()))
+		return 0
 	}
 	return float64(binary.BigEndian.Uint64(b[:])) / (1 << 64)
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fded093 and e0bd150.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pkg/pb/base/v1/openapi.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • docs/api-reference/apidocs.swagger.json (1 hunks)
  • docs/api-reference/openapiv2/apidocs.swagger.json (1 hunks)
  • internal/info.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/storage/postgres/utils/common.go (2 hunks)
  • proto/base/v1/openapi.proto (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • internal/info.go
  • docs/api-reference/apidocs.swagger.json
  • docs/api-reference/openapiv2/apidocs.swagger.json
  • proto/base/v1/openapi.proto
🔇 Additional comments (5)
internal/storage/postgres/utils/common.go (5)

5-6: Use of crypto/rand is more secure than math/rand.
This change ensures cryptographically secure random number generation, mitigating predictability in backoff jitter.


159-161: Base backoff calculation is appropriate.
Using exponential growth limited to 1 second is a standard approach for controlling reconnection or retry storms.


162-165: Great use of jitter for backoff.
Jitter helps avoid synchronized retries across multiple clients, reducing load spikes.


171-171: Context cancellation check is correct.
Terminating early if the context is done prevents unnecessary waits.


177-177: Maintain a concise code layout.
This blank line is a minor formatting choice, but everything looks fine. No action needed.

@tolgaozen tolgaozen merged commit ba6f13c into master Jan 3, 2025
10 of 12 checks passed
@tolgaozen tolgaozen deleted the feature/secure-jitter-backoff branch January 3, 2025 13:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants