Add Content Helper options integration tests #2672
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the integration tests for the Parsely plugin by adding three new methods to validate Content Helper permission settings. These tests cover scenarios for both new installations and upgrades of existing installations, ensuring that permission defaults and user-specific settings function as intended across different versions of the plugin. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Plugin
participant Database
User->>Plugin: Install new plugin
Plugin->>Database: Set default permissions (admin only)
Database-->>Plugin: Confirm permissions set
User->>Plugin: Upgrade existing plugin
Plugin->>Database: Check existing permissions
alt No prior settings
Plugin->>Database: Set permissions based on edit_posts capability
else Existing settings found
Plugin->>Database: Retrieve existing permissions
end
Database-->>Plugin: Confirm permissions retrieved/updated
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/Integration/OptionsTest.php (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
tests/Integration/OptionsTest.php (1)
Pattern
**/*.{html,php}: "Perform a detailed review of the provided code with following key aspects in mind:
- Review the HTML and PHP code to ensure it is well-structured and adheres to best practices.
- Ensure the code follows WordPress coding standards and is well-documented.
- Confirm the code is secure and free from vulnerabilities.
- Optimize the code for performance, removing any unnecessary elements.
- Validate comments for accuracy, currency, and adherence to WordPress coding standards.
- Ensure each line comment concludes with a period.
- Verify code compatibility with the latest version of WordPress, avoiding deprecated functions or features."
Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/Integration/OptionsTest.php (3)
579-591: LGTM! Verify the usage ofPermissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_array.The test correctly verifies the default Content Helper permissions for a new plugin installation.
However, ensure that the
Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_arraymethod is correctly implemented and used.Verification successful
Verified: The
Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_arraymethod is correctly implemented.The method correctly constructs the permissions settings array based on the provided parameters, which aligns with the expectations in the test.
- File:
src/class-permissions.php- Method:
Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_arrayScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_array`. # Test: Search for the method implementation. Expect: Correct implementation. ast-grep --lang php --pattern $'class Permissions { $$$ public static function build_pch_permissions_settings_array($_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 260
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_array`. # Test: Search for the method implementation. Expect: Correct implementation. rg 'public static function build_pch_permissions_settings_array' -A 10Length of output: 687
651-665: LGTM! Verify the usage ofPermissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_array.The test correctly verifies the Content Helper permissions for an existing plugin installation with prior Content Helper options.
However, ensure that the
Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_arraymethod is correctly implemented and used.Verification successful
Verified: The implementation of
Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_arrayis correct.The method
Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_arrayis correctly implemented insrc/class-permissions.phpand matches its usage in the testtest_content_helper_options_in_existing_plugin_install_subsequent_runs.
src/class-permissions.php: Correct implementation ofPermissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_array.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_array`. # Test: Search for the method implementation. Expect: Correct implementation. ast-grep --lang php --pattern $'class Permissions { $$$ public static function build_pch_permissions_settings_array($_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 260
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `Permissions::build_pch_permissions_settings_array`. # Test: Search for the method implementation in PHP files. Expect: Correct implementation. rg 'public static function build_pch_permissions_settings_array' -A 10 --glob '*.php'Length of output: 702
616-630: LGTM! Verify the usage ofPermissions::get_user_roles_with_edit_posts_cap.The test correctly verifies the default Content Helper permissions for an existing plugin installation without prior Content Helper options.
However, ensure that the
Permissions::get_user_roles_with_edit_posts_capmethod is correctly implemented and used.Verification successful
Verified: The
Permissions::get_user_roles_with_edit_posts_capmethod is correctly implemented.The method accurately retrieves user roles with the
edit_postscapability and returns them as an array.
- Implementation found in
src/class-permissions.php.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `Permissions::get_user_roles_with_edit_posts_cap`. # Test: Search for the method implementation. Expect: Correct implementation. ast-grep --lang php --pattern $'class Permissions { $$$ public static function get_user_roles_with_edit_posts_cap() { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 252
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `Permissions::get_user_roles_with_edit_posts_cap`. # Test: Search for the method implementation. Expect: Correct implementation. rg "public static function get_user_roles_with_edit_posts_cap" -A 10Length of output: 641
vaurdan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for working on this!
Description
This PR adds some tests for testing Content Helper options initialization behavior, under different conditions.
Motivation and context
Increase our tested code coverage.
How has this been tested?
Tests logic has been validated, and tests pass.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes