Tablet data as proof doesn't verify much as it doesn't necessarily prove what the tablet is doing, could you do separate data recordings for the different functions of the tablet?

Tablet data as proof doesn't verify much as it doesn't necessarily prove what the tablet is doing, could you do separate data recordings for the different functions of the tablet?

You mean separate recordings for the tablet buttons, pen pressure / buttons, movement etc.?

Yes.

aux_buttons.txt
movement.txt
pen_buttons.txt
pen_pressure.txt

I'd still prefer a different naming scheme to avoid the breaking change if any other tablets use this parser in the future.

It likely accomodates all Veikk tablets that currently use the SkipByteTabletReportParser.

Parser looks fine.

That's seems to be all Veikk Axx tablets, except those v2 models that use VeikkReportParser instead. The naming is a bit confusing, because there is also a VeikkV2ReportParser which is used instead by the S640. I could rename VeikkA15ReportParser to VeikkV1ReportParser or VeikkAxxV1ReportParser maybe?

VeikkV1ReportParser should be fine for now. We'll be improving the naming scheme of our parsers at some point.

Is tilt out of scope?

Is tilt out of scope?

I only have the old A15 without tilt, so I don't know how that works.