Skip to content

Cilk For-Range Loop#303

Merged
neboat merged 6 commits intoOpenCilk:dev/18.xfrom
eliecuevas:dev/18.x
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

Cilk For-Range Loop#303
neboat merged 6 commits intoOpenCilk:dev/18.xfrom
eliecuevas:dev/18.x

Conversation

@eliecuevas
Copy link
Contributor

Co-Authored by arvid220u and sualehasif

Copy link
Collaborator

@neboat neboat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for submitting this PR! I'm super excited to add this new feature to Cilk, and I'm delighted to see this revival and fixup of PR #55.

This PR also gives us a great opportunity to work on our processes for accepting external contributions, which I appreciate!

I've done some simple tests of these Cilk for-range loops on my local system, and they seem to work well.

I have just a couple minor requests:

  • GitHub can annotate multiauthor commits in the history, but it needs the email addresses of the coauthors to do so. I believe that something like the following should work:
    Co-authored-by: Sualeh Asif <sualehasif996@gmail.com>
    Co-authored-by: Arvid Lunnemark <arvid.lunnemark@gmail.com>
    
    Please update the Co-authored-by lines in the first commit with those email addresses. Hopefully GitHub will recognize the coauthors properly.
  • Please address the minor comments I've left on the code itself.

Once those are addressed, I'm happy to accept this PR. Please let me know if you have questions or concerns.

Thanks again!

Copy link
Collaborator

@neboat neboat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes look good to me. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants