Skip to content

chore: initialize fork branch#9550

Closed
lzrzhao wants to merge 3 commits into
NousResearch:mainfrom
lzrzhao:codex/fork-workflow-ready
Closed

chore: initialize fork branch#9550
lzrzhao wants to merge 3 commits into
NousResearch:mainfrom
lzrzhao:codex/fork-workflow-ready

Conversation

@lzrzhao

@lzrzhao lzrzhao commented Apr 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bootstrap PR to verify fork/branch/PR workflow from lzrzhao fork.\n\n- No functional code changes\n- Contains an empty commit to establish branch divergence

@alt-glitch alt-glitch added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Apr 27, 2026
@teknium1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing as part of an automated hermes-sweeper review.

This PR was opened explicitly to test the fork/branch/PR workflow and is not intended for merge:

  • The PR body states: "Bootstrap PR to verify fork/branch/PR workflow… No functional code changes. Contains an empty commit to establish branch divergence."
  • The PR is a draft and was labeled invalid by @alt-glitch.
  • The author's linked issue #9561 separately proposes the rolling compaction feature and explicitly offers to open a focused follow-up PR if maintainers are interested.

If the rolling compaction idea has merit, it's best tracked and evaluated through issue #9561 rather than this bootstrap PR.

@teknium1 teknium1 closed this Jun 10, 2026
@teknium1 teknium1 added the sweeper:incoherent Sweeper: insufficient/incoherent to action label Jun 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

invalid This doesn't seem right sweeper:incoherent Sweeper: insufficient/incoherent to action

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants