Conversation
12ae6e5 to
e8a2c99
Compare
e8a2c99 to
a115efa
Compare
a115efa to
788b3f4
Compare
|
HeitorAugustoLN
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! Also built cosmic-idle package with this hook and it worked as expected.
|
Maybe all the cosmic-* packages should be updated to use this hook in this pr or should that be a separate PR? |
I prefer it in a separate PR, I am planning to do it after this PR is merged. |
|
tbh I don't really get the point of this setup hook because it is unclear what the relevant interface of a "libcosmic app" is. This just looks like a bunch of miscellaneous Cargo stuff that isn't really specific to libcosmic. |
It mostly does some boilerplate required for every libcosmic application, that is mostly wrapping the binary to with dependencies: |
|
@Ericson2314 This is mostly a wrapper for software that uses the @HeitorAugustoLN I have the code that uses this apphook ready. Just waiting for this PR to merge. :) |
|
Ah is the problem that since we're talking In that case, carry on :) |
|
Exactly, yes. |
GaetanLepage
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nits. Otherwise LGTM.
788b3f4 to
239a2d7
Compare
239a2d7 to
5f411a7
Compare
GaetanLepage
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM.
Also, I know that this hook has been used downstream in nixos-cosmic. Hence, I am fairly confident merging this.
|
Yes, it originates from |
drupol
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Diff LGTM, but I haven't tested.
|
Nothing to test at the moment, it's a setup hook. I will follow up with more PRs in the |
Any plans for the module portion of it as well? |
Maybe we should wait for the beta to be released? |
I don't see why we should stop a module, the packages are already here, maybe we can add a disclaimer in the module description that says it's experimental? |
I was not saying this for the users, but also, and mostly, for the maintenance. Having said that, I would have absolutely no objection in merging a PR adding the cosmic module(s). |
Yes, I'll reuse the bits (and feedback) from #369113. A bit occupied by work, should send it by the end of this week. Edit: I plan to upstream just a basic module that simply allows you to enable the greeter + DE and not much else so that should be good enough for testing the state of packages too. |
|
I suggest before adding this hook to |
|
Ideally it would be @thefossguy, since they created the PR in the first place. |
Part of #369113
cc: @nyabinary
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.