Skip to content

gcc/{11,12}: use lib.pipe#217981

Closed
ghost wants to merge 1 commit intostagingfrom
unknown repository
Closed

gcc/{11,12}: use lib.pipe#217981
ghost wants to merge 1 commit intostagingfrom
unknown repository

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ghost ghost commented Feb 24, 2023

Description of changes

This commit has no effect on eval. It simply reorganizes the gcc11 and gcc12 expressions so they apply a list of overrideAttrs. The list is currently empty.

Cc: @trofi

Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

This commit has no effect on eval.  It simply reorganizes the
`gcc11` and `gcc12` expressions so they apply a list of
`overrideAttrs`.  The list is currently empty.
@ghost ghost requested a review from matthewbauer as a code owner February 24, 2023 07:30
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2023
4 tasks
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Feb 24, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trofi trofi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Now that I looked at pipe definition) These changes are small enough to be present as part of actual changes applied to gcc expression. I would say no need for a separate PR for them (unless someone else requested for it as well).

@ghost ghost closed this Feb 25, 2023
@ghost ghost deleted the pr/gcc/lib-pipe branch January 23, 2024 06:48
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant