python310Packages.pip: 22.0.4 -> 22.1.2#178732
Conversation
|
Successfully created backport PR #178766 for |
|
Any opinions on the regression in the backport? #178766 (comment) |
|
Reading #178766 (comment) is further action required?
slightly threw me off |
|
Well, I consider my knowledge around this rather limited. I quickly came with something that looked like resolving all related regressions, but I'm not confident about it. |
|
well if pip-tools is the only thing that regressed and 6.6.2 resolves that I'd say it's sorted? 🤷 If there are other issues maybe we undo the backport? It'd be a lot easier to decide if it's an important backport if there was actually a CVE rather than a PRISMA id & I don't have access to the details :/ |
|
I saw nothing else notable on the build farm. On 22.05 it's more confident, as the failures are much more stable due to changes being fewer and safer. |
Description of changes
Bump pip to
22.1.2Resolves a prisma cloud complaint
Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.shto update generated release notes