fontforge: 20201107 -> 20220308#163439
Conversation
948ec40 to
5c2d50b
Compare
refactor the debian patch to apply still seems required to get the extra binaries Co-authored-by: Jan Tojnar <jtojnar@gmail.com> (suggestion for partial applying the fetched patch)
jtojnar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes look good to me, did not test.
|
hmm |
|
That is part of setuptools python package. |
erictapen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Regarding the python error: As python plugins were only introduced in this version, I guess it doesn't make anything worse than it was?
The remainder looks good to me, thanks a lot! Interested in adding yourself to maintainers of the package, @evils?
my guess also :)
if i end up using it more, i just did this because i bumped it to the latest master a while ago because the packaged version occasionally crashed while giving it a go |
Should that be added? As is there’s a popup error message every time I open FontForge. I’m inclined to just add it myself but it’s not clear to me how it should interact with |
Description of changes
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/releases/tag/20220308
Things done
updated the package
removed the upstreamed patch
edited the debian patch so it applies again
still seems required to get the extra binaries
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usagerebuild-amount.shestimates 9633 packages affected, turns out a lot of stuff uses fonts..../result/bin/)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.shto update generated release notes