Nixpkgs version
Describe the bug
The derivation nix-functional-tests is failing to build during nixos-rebuild switch --flake ...
This causes failures in derivations named nix, lazy-options.json, options.json, nixos-manual-html, nixos-configuration-reference-manpage, nixos-help, and others.
Steps to reproduce
Run nixos-rebuild using nixpkgs at commit 8c809a146a140c5c8806f13399592dbcb1bb5dc4. Nothing in my configuration has changed since the last successful nixos-rebuild except the nixpkgs flake input. Several of the packages listed as depending on the failed derivation are ones that are not directly enabled in my config.
Expected behaviour
The packages in question should build successfully.
Screenshots
No response
Relevant log output
./stale-file-handle-inner.sh: test failed at:
main in ./stale-file-handle-inner.sh:40
Summary of Failures:
201/201 local-overlay-store - nix-functional-tests:stale-file-handle FAIL 1.45s exit status 1
Additional context
No response
System metadata
- system:
"x86_64-linux"
- host os:
Linux 6.19.0, NixOS, 26.05 (Yarara), 26.05.20260213.a82ccc3
- multi-user?:
yes
- sandbox:
yes
- version:
nix-env (Lix, like Nix) 2.94.0 System type: x86_64-linux Additional system types: i686-linux, x86_64-v1-linux, x86_64-v2-linux Features: gc, signed-caches System configuration file: /etc/nix/nix.conf User configuration files: /home/jeremy/.config/nix/nix.conf:/nix/store/rh4zf44gppzng6y2xxiq1d3k8k0hd9jn-cinnamon-settings-daemon-6.6.3/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/home/jeremy/.nix-profile/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/nix/profile/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/home/jeremy/.local/state/nix/profile/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/etc/profiles/per-user/jeremy/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/nix/var/nix/profiles/default/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/run/current-system/sw/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf Store directory: /nix/store State directory: /nix/var/nix Data directory: /nix/store/g50ix07jnnx47bvskvlsjv6b3s986ns3-lix-2.94.0/share
- channels(jeremy):
"home-manager-23.05.tar.gz"
- channels(root):
"my-config, nixpkgs-stable-23.11"
- nixpkgs:
/etc/current-nixpkgs
Notify maintainers
Note for maintainers: Please tag this issue in your pull request description. (i.e. Resolves #ISSUE.)
I assert that this issue is relevant for Nixpkgs
Is this issue important to you?
Add a 👍 reaction to issues you find important.
Nixpkgs version
Describe the bug
The derivation
nix-functional-testsis failing to build duringnixos-rebuild switch --flake ...This causes failures in derivations named
nix,lazy-options.json,options.json,nixos-manual-html,nixos-configuration-reference-manpage,nixos-help, and others.Steps to reproduce
Run
nixos-rebuildusing nixpkgs at commit8c809a146a140c5c8806f13399592dbcb1bb5dc4. Nothing in my configuration has changed since the last successfulnixos-rebuildexcept the nixpkgs flake input. Several of the packages listed as depending on the failed derivation are ones that are not directly enabled in my config.Expected behaviour
The packages in question should build successfully.
Screenshots
No response
Relevant log output
Additional context
No response
System metadata
"x86_64-linux"Linux 6.19.0, NixOS, 26.05 (Yarara), 26.05.20260213.a82ccc3yesyesnix-env (Lix, like Nix) 2.94.0 System type: x86_64-linux Additional system types: i686-linux, x86_64-v1-linux, x86_64-v2-linux Features: gc, signed-caches System configuration file: /etc/nix/nix.conf User configuration files: /home/jeremy/.config/nix/nix.conf:/nix/store/rh4zf44gppzng6y2xxiq1d3k8k0hd9jn-cinnamon-settings-daemon-6.6.3/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/home/jeremy/.nix-profile/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/nix/profile/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/home/jeremy/.local/state/nix/profile/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/etc/profiles/per-user/jeremy/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/nix/var/nix/profiles/default/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf:/run/current-system/sw/etc/xdg/nix/nix.conf Store directory: /nix/store State directory: /nix/var/nix Data directory: /nix/store/g50ix07jnnx47bvskvlsjv6b3s986ns3-lix-2.94.0/share"home-manager-23.05.tar.gz""my-config, nixpkgs-stable-23.11"/etc/current-nixpkgsNotify maintainers
Note for maintainers: Please tag this issue in your pull request description. (i.e.
Resolves #ISSUE.)I assert that this issue is relevant for Nixpkgs
Is this issue important to you?
Add a 👍 reaction to issues you find important.